timtyler comments on Philosophy Needs to Trust Your Rationality Even Though It Shouldn't - LessWrong

27 Post author: lukeprog 29 November 2012 09:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (169)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: timtyler 30 November 2012 01:41:55AM *  3 points [-]

Luke quoted:

Science is built around the assumption that you're too stupid and self-deceiving to just use [probability theory]. After all, if it was that simple, we wouldn't need a social process of science... [Standard scientific method] doesn't trust your rationality, and it doesn't rely on your ability to use probability theory as the arbiter of truth. It wants you to set up a definitive experiment.

That's a pretty irritatingly-wrong quote. Of course the scientific method is social of reasons other than the stupidity and self-deceiving nature of scientists. For example, the scientists doing the cigarette-company-funded science probably weren't stupid or self-deceiving. Other scientists doubted their science for a different set of reasons.