Benito comments on By Which It May Be Judged - LessWrong

35 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 10 December 2012 04:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (934)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Benito 26 December 2012 07:30:34PM 1 point [-]

Hmm... I don't think my point necessarily helps here. I meant that you will always get disutility when you have two desires that always clash (x and not x); whichever way you choose, the other desire won't be fulfilled.

However, in the case you offered (and probably most cases) it's not a good idea to self-modify, as desires don't clash in principle, always. Like with the chocolate and saving kids one, you just have to perform utility calculations to see which way to go (that one is saving kids).

Comment author: MugaSofer 27 December 2012 02:28:10AM 0 points [-]

you will always get disutility when you have two desires that always clash (x and not x); whichever way you choose, the other desire won't be fulfilled.

Yup. And if you stop caring about one of those values, then modified!you will be happier. But you don't care about what modified!you wants, you care about x and not-x.