srn347 comments on Second-Order Logic: The Controversy - LessWrong

24 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 04 January 2013 07:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (188)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 January 2013 04:58:34AM 1 point [-]

If I may interject (assuming it isn't too early to start proposing solutions), it does turn out to be the case that computability logic is a superset of linear logic, which encodes resource-boundedness and avoids material entailment paradoxes, intuitionistic logic, which encodes proof/justification, and classical logic, which encodes truth. To accept less is to sacrifice one or more of the above attributes in terms of expressiveness.

Comment author: abramdemski 08 January 2013 05:54:07AM 0 points [-]

Thanks; I certainly didn't intend to say that all logics are equivalent so it doesn't matter... edited to clarify...