= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Decius comments on Prisoner's Dilemma (with visible source code) Tournament - LessWrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (232)
A proves that A is inconsistent, then proves that A cooperates with every program that A proves is Reasonable and that B is reasonable.
B accepts A's proof that A is inconsistent, and the rest follow trivially.
I'm not sure I understand. A is a TM - which aspect is it proving inconsistent?
A proves that the logic A uses to prove that B is Reasonable is inconsistent. It is sufficient to say "If I can prove that B is Reasonable, B is Reasonable".