wedrifid comments on Arguments Against Speciesism - LessWrong

28 Post author: Lukas_Gloor 28 July 2013 06:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (474)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MugaSofer 29 July 2013 03:51:14PM 0 points [-]

Why should there be a "correct" solution for ethical reasoning? Is there a normative level regarding which color is the best?

Well, obviously this wouldn't hold for, say, paperclippers ... but while I suspect you may disagree, most people seem to think human ethics are not mutually contradictory and are, in fact, part of the psychological unity of humankind (most include caveats for psychopaths, political enemies, and those possessed by demons.)

Imagine forcing a programmer to treat all incoming data with the exact same rule.

Such a (highly complex) rule is known as a "program".

Comment author: wedrifid 29 July 2013 04:00:11PM 1 point [-]

but while I suspect you may disagree, most people seem to think human ethics are not mutually contradictory and are, in fact, part of the psychological unity of humankind (most include caveats for psychopaths, political enemies, and those possessed by demons.)

As a bonus, the exception class of "enemies" and "immoral monsters" tends to be contrived to include anyone who has a sufficient degree of difference in ethical preferences. All True humans are ethically united...

Comment author: MugaSofer 31 July 2013 02:51:22PM 0 points [-]

I'm torn between grinning at how marvelously well-contrived it is on evolution's part and frustrated that, y'know, I have to live here, and I keep stepping in the mindkill.

Of course, I'll note they're usually wrong. Except about some of the psychopaths, I suppose, though even they seem to contain bits of it if I understand correctly.