TheAncientGeek comments on Lone Genius Bias and Returns on Additional Researchers - LessWrong

24 Post author: ChrisHallquist 01 November 2013 12:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (63)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 01 November 2013 01:52:06PM -1 points [-]

most of what's labeled "philosophy" in the bookstore will actively make them worse at philosophy, especially compared to someone who avoids everything labeled "philosophy" and instead studies the Sequences, math, logic, computer science, AI, physics, and cognitive science.

There is, of course, no evidence for that claim.

Comment author: roystgnr 01 November 2013 06:29:00PM 6 points [-]

I'm reminded of when someone once told me there was no evidence against Mormonism, and I remain dumbfounded that anyone would expect such a statement to increase support for their position. It's incredibly rare to encounter a controversy so one-sided that you can't find any evidence for the other side, but it's sadly common to find opinionated people who are either ignorant of or unreasonably dismissive of all evidence contrary to those opinions.

The special irony in this case is that even the reductio ad absurdum "There is no progress in philosophy" is itself a philosophically defensible claim.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 04 November 2013 04:36:24PM 4 points [-]

I don't know where you are going with that. There is abundant evidence that studying X makes you better at X for most values of X, and someone who thinks there is an exception for some specific X, needs to provide evidence for the somewhat extraordinary claim.

Comment author: V_V 01 November 2013 02:09:33PM -2 points [-]

In fact, it seems the typical crackpot claim that mainstream education in a domain is counterproductive.