EHeller comments on Lone Genius Bias and Returns on Additional Researchers - LessWrong

24 Post author: ChrisHallquist 01 November 2013 12:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (63)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: EHeller 02 November 2013 06:47:11PM *  6 points [-]

There is also the possibility that they believe that MIRI/FHI/CEA/CFAR will have no impact on the intelligence explosion or the far future.

Comment author: endoself 02 November 2013 08:25:58PM 4 points [-]

He's talking specifically about people donating to AMF. There are more things people can do than donate to AMF and donate to one of MIRI, FHI, CEA, and CFAR.

Comment author: lukeprog 03 November 2013 02:37:50AM 1 point [-]

Correct.

Comment author: private_messaging 29 December 2013 10:51:48AM *  0 points [-]

Or simply because the quality of research is positively correlated with ability to secure funding, and thus research that would not be done without your donations generally has the lowest expected value of all research. In case of malaria, we need quantity, in case of AI research, we need quality.