= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Jack comments on On Walmart, And Who Bears Responsibility For the Poor - LessWrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (510)
What I'm telling you is that the BIG is a policy that has been loudly lauded, not merely by run-of-the-mill progressives, but by people so far left they happily call themselves socialists.
Read the list of people involved with The U.S. Basic Income Guarantee Network and tell me it is a libertarian stronghold.
Liberal pundits tend to have considerably more political power than libertarians and so don't spend a lot of time calling for remaking the entire US social welfare system from the ground up. And they tend to think the ongoing existence of people living in poverty is a bigger priority than shrinking the government regulatory state. But they certainly show willingness to replace some government programs while implementing a BIG and discuss it positively as an alternative to other means of alleviating poverty for exactly the same reason libertarians like it.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/02/17/guaranteed_basic_income_the_real_alternative_to_the_minimum_wage.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/08/08/obama-doesnt-want-to-just-write-welfare-recipients-checks-but-what-if-we-did/
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/10/how-to-cut-the-poverty-rate-in-half-its-easy/280971/
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/23/business/23scene.html
If you read the articles you cite, you'd see that they refer primarily to Charles Murray and Milton Friedman.
The only reference to a prominent US liberal I see is one to Martin Luther King Jr.
It would be great if more liberals got on the train, but from your comments, they're not really on board.
Problem is, if they're of the disposition to meddle in people's lives, it seems unlikely that the poor will be left out of their tender ministrations. Keeping the current punitive welfare programs intact would keep all the perverse incentives, but at a higher benefit level, making for an even larger trapped and dependent class.
The articles I cite were written by progressive pundits. And the biggest organization dedicated to it is mostly made up of socialist academics.
The percentage of self-identified libertarians who support a basic income guarantee is certainly higher than the percentage of liberals who support a basic income guarantee. Hell, it's probably higher than the percentage of liberals who have heard of a basic income guarantee. I don't even know that that is indicative of some special trait about libertarians --not having any political power or influence makes it much easier to defend only the best ideas. But if you want to claim victory for your tribe, no one will stop you.
Libertarians 1, Progressives 0! Go Greens! Down with the Blues!
I already agree with you.