hyporational comments on According to Dale Carnegie, You Can't Win an Argument—and He Has a Point - LessWrong

61 Post author: ChrisHallquist 30 November 2013 06:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (77)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: hyporational 30 November 2013 05:13:52PM *  0 points [-]

In Plato's dialogs, what Socrates is mostly trying to lead his interlocutor into a contradiction

Yes, well this certainly isn't what I meant so it's good that you brought this up. Miller's law describes you better. I suspect Socratic method has invaded common language to the point it has lost some of its original meaning.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 30 November 2013 05:52:47PM *  0 points [-]

Socratic method has invaded common language to the point it has lost some of its original meaning.

Absolutely. As I say, I find the term ambiguous, but I don't disagree with the claim.

That said, I have often run into the problem of people getting extremely anxious when asked questions that don't quite fit into their script of how the conversation is supposed to go. Sometimes that's just because their beliefs are fragile and rigidly held, but sometimes it seems more that they're afraid I'm going to try to make them look/feel stupid. So it's something I try to stay aware of.

EDIT: And I just noticed your edit, and was amused.