ChristianKl comments on Don't teach people how to reach the top of a hill - LessWrong

30 Post author: PhilGoetz 04 March 2014 09:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 01 April 2014 09:20:58PM 0 points [-]

Note that our minds are massively parallel calculators that don't necessarily require language, yet our instructions are sequential and language-based.

Not all teaching is sequential and/or language based. It's just the most popular way to teach. Especially for people who believe that reductionism is useful.

NLP (Neuro-linguistic programming) is for example not taught in a sequentlial fashion if you learn it from Richard Bandler or students of Bandler.

That makes conversations about whether it's backed up by scientific evidence hard, because the idea of science is that you can test sequential step to see if they work.