but so are many theories more highly regarded than it nowadays. Like physics.
Um, the entire point of the Occam's Razor/Kolmogorov complexity approach is physics isn't complicated.
And do you think Taleb is speaking in a specific, precise, highly-technical, highly unusual definition of 'complex' rarely found outside of computer science circles and extremely niche interest groups like LessWrong? Or do you think he is speaking in the usual colloquial sense of 'complex' which everyone understands and under which physics is indeed extremely complex and difficult?
Another month has passed and here is a new rationality quotes thread. The usual rules are:
And one new rule: