eli_sennesh comments on Confused as to usefulness of 'consciousness' as a concept - LessWrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (229)
Ok, so let's say I put two different systems in front of you, and I tell you that system A is conscious whereas system B is not. Based on this knowledge, can you make any meaningful predictions about the differences in behavior between the two systems ? As far as I can tell, the answer is "no". Here are some possible differences that people have proposed over the years:
Perhaps system A would be a much better conversation partner than system B. But no, System B could just be really good at pretending that it's conscious, without exhibiting any true consciousness at all.
System A will perform better at a variety of cognitive tasks. But no, that's intelligence, not consciousness, and in fact system B might be a lot smarter than A.
System A deserves moral consideration, whereas system B is just a tool. Ok, but I asked you for a prediction, not a prescription.
It is quite possible that I'm missing something; but if I'm not, then consciousness is an empty concept, since it has no effect on anything we can actually observe.
At least personally, I expect the conscious system A to be "self-maintaining" in some sense, to defend its own cognition in a way that an intelligent-but-unconscious system wouldn't.