eli_sennesh comments on Confused as to usefulness of 'consciousness' as a concept - LessWrong

35 Post author: KnaveOfAllTrades 13 July 2014 11:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (229)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Bugmaster 14 July 2014 06:21:20PM *  3 points [-]

Ok, so let's say I put two different systems in front of you, and I tell you that system A is conscious whereas system B is not. Based on this knowledge, can you make any meaningful predictions about the differences in behavior between the two systems ? As far as I can tell, the answer is "no". Here are some possible differences that people have proposed over the years:

  • Perhaps system A would be a much better conversation partner than system B. But no, System B could just be really good at pretending that it's conscious, without exhibiting any true consciousness at all.

  • System A will perform better at a variety of cognitive tasks. But no, that's intelligence, not consciousness, and in fact system B might be a lot smarter than A.

  • System A deserves moral consideration, whereas system B is just a tool. Ok, but I asked you for a prediction, not a prescription.

It is quite possible that I'm missing something; but if I'm not, then consciousness is an empty concept, since it has no effect on anything we can actually observe.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 July 2014 04:02:13PM 1 point [-]

At least personally, I expect the conscious system A to be "self-maintaining" in some sense, to defend its own cognition in a way that an intelligent-but-unconscious system wouldn't.