DanArmak comments on Confused as to usefulness of 'consciousness' as a concept - LessWrong

35 Post author: KnaveOfAllTrades 13 July 2014 11:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (229)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 18 July 2014 08:19:10AM 1 point [-]

Also, every use of the word "every" has exceptions.

Yes, inclusive fitness is a much better approximation than "every living thing tries to avoid death". And gene's-eye-view is better than that. And non-genetic replicators have their place. And evolved things are adaptation executers. And sometimes living beings are just so bad at avoiding death that their "expressed behavioral preferences" look like something else entirely.

I still think my generalization is a highly accurate one and makes the point I wanted to make.

Comment author: [deleted] 18 July 2014 11:11:01AM 1 point [-]

Also, every use of the word "every" has exceptions.

Including this one.

Comment author: DanArmak 18 July 2014 12:45:42PM 1 point [-]

Naturally. For instance true mathematical theorems saying that every X is Y have no exceptions.