Lumifer comments on A Cost- Benefit Analysis of Immunizing Healthy Adults Against Influenza - LessWrong

14 Post author: Fluttershy 11 November 2014 04:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (81)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 11 November 2014 05:36:36PM *  1 point [-]

Well, if we're doing the calculation specifically for me, we can put in more precise numbers. If I stay at home sick for week, my income will drop by $0. So, replace $1000 with $0. I also have health insurance which will pay for the hospital visit, but I'm sure there will be some co-pays, let's say $200. So...

flu shot: $30+(0.02*0)+(0.0001*200) = $30.02
no flu shot: $0+(0.05*0)+(0.00025*200) = $0.05

Ooops :-D

Comment author: Weedlayer 11 November 2014 07:28:20PM 1 point [-]

Well, if you don't value your health at all, then this seems valid.

Comment author: Nornagest 11 November 2014 07:35:47PM *  1 point [-]

OP's analysis has a term for quality of life issues stemming from the illness; it just happens to be a fourth of the magnitude of lost productivity ($200 vs. $800). The latter ends up dominating the calculation. There's also a term for the costs of palliative care, estimated at $100, but that looks a little sketchy to me; a package of Theraflu and some tissues and cough drops would run maybe $20.

On the other hand, Lumifer's health insurance would probably cover the flu shot. Mine would.

Comment author: CCC 11 November 2014 08:26:04PM *  0 points [-]

I also have health insurance

Virtually all health insurance will also pay for the flu shot (since paying for a flu shot for all their members is less expensive than paying for their hospital stays). So:

flu shot: $0+(0.02*0)+(0.0001*200) = $0.02

no flu shot: $0+(0.05*0)+(0.00025*200) = $0.05

...percentage-wise, that's huge.

Comment author: Lumifer 11 November 2014 09:11:39PM 3 points [-]

Virtually all health insurance will also pay for the flu shot

Evidently, socialized medicine (in the UK) does not.

...percentage-wise, that's huge.

LOL.

Comment author: CCC 12 November 2014 09:36:40AM 1 point [-]

Evidently, socialized medicine (in the UK) does not.

Huh. Well, that's unexpected.

Comment author: Wes_W 11 November 2014 11:45:09PM *  -1 points [-]

Only some of the $1000 cost was lost income. You are, of course, welcome to substitute your own numbers for the expected cost of self-care and your subjective disutility of being sick for a week, but setting those to zero seems implausible: that is, if there were an instant flu-curing pill, I strongly doubt you would be unwilling to buy it at any price.