But in that list of problems, they keep on saying "Unscientifically simplified, Unscientifically claimed, etc", which is a problem unless they define science. They clearly haven't learned how to taboo words like science, which shows here.
Tabooing words is a tool, not a mandatory exercise. They weren't relying on the word "unscientifically" to do the work for them.
For example, here is the first instance of the word I spotted upon looking at the article again:
...de Grey also casually rules out the contributions of non-oncogenic epimutation to aging through “guilt by association” misrepresentation. He groups together nDNA mutation and epimutation, provides grossly insufficient evidence to rule out nDNA mutation as important in aging, and then declares epimutation is ruled out as wel
Another month, another rationality quotes thread. The rules are: