eventually the truth/reality/answer is indifferent to the phrasing of the question (as why/how). I do think phrasing it as how makes it easier to answer(in the instrumental sense) than why. Also what is the exception, am not aware of it, please point me.
"Why are you in the hospital?" - "Because I was injured when a car hit me."
"Why did the car hit you?" - "Because the driver was drunk and I was standing at the intersection."
"Why was the driver drunk?" and "Why were you standing at the intersection?" and so on and so forth.
Every "why" question about something occurring in the natural world is answered by going one (or more) levels down in the granularity, describing one high-level phenomenon via its components, typically lower-level phe...
Another month, another rationality quotes thread. The rules are: