So you are using "real" in the sense of "matching my current ideas of what's likely". I think this approach is likely to... lead to problems.
Er... no. Okay, look, here's the definition I provided from an earlier comment:
By "real correlation" I mean a correlation that is not simply an artifact of your statistical analysis, but is actually "present in the data", so to speak.
You seemed to understand this well enough to engage with it, even going so far as to ask me how I would distinguish between the two (answer: redundancy), but now you're saying that I'm using "real" to mean "matching my current ideas of what's likely"? If there's something in the quot...
Another month, another rationality quotes thread. The rules are: