= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
PhilGoetz comments on Using machine learning to predict romantic compatibility: empirical results - LessWrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (18)
Thanks! Does "false positives" mean "percentage of positive calls that were false?" I'd rather see the data presented as counts than percentages.
It would be interesting to also have data on whether the raters were looking for a long-term or short term relationship.