I cannot construct a coherent argument for intelligent design
You probably can if you start with a different set of axioms.
Note that, for example, "God exists" is not a lie but a non-falsifiable proposition.
According to supporters of intelligent design, "intelligent design" implies not using any religious premises. So if you started with that axiom, then you're not really talking about intelligent design after all.
Another month, another rationality quotes thread. The rules are: