Strip Lumifer of all the hostility, and he's right. Your comments are unpleasant to read. You said in a comment below, that certain comments should be against community norms and commenters should be “inquisitive and open-minded rather than combative and dismissive”. First of all, commenters don't owe you to be anyone and they would rightly complain. Second, I would rather have your comment to be against community norms.

Translate your high-brow rhetoric, and you get “I'm so much smarter than you. You need to be grateful that I'm writing these articles and comments for you. When my arguments are weak, you should steelman them yourself. You should agree with me, otherwise I'll deem your criticism non-constructive, and you non-inquisitive and not having an open mind. I'm wasting time on you and could be doing better things than talking to worms like you. But hey, I'm so much better than you, that exactly because of that I condenscend to you, because I'm Jesus and I love you. But I spent 15 years loving people and they didn't love me in return, these ungrateful swines.”

I don't care that you don't intend to seem like that. Intentions are inside your mind, appearances are what people actually see.

I hear lots of times that LW is a hostile place with terrible community tendencies for social interactions. I personally dislike lots of things about LW and would want it to improve. But you're the first person, whose comments were intensely unpleasant to read. Even neoreactionaries are nicer people.

Your comments in this thread are wrong on so many levels regardless of your position on mathematical ability. Imagine Yudkowsky going on long arguments in comment section about how people don't understand him, and how he loves them, and how he's so much smarter than them — there would be no LessWrong community.