TheAncientGeek comments on Hedonium's semantic problem - LessWrong

12 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 09 April 2015 11:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 12 April 2015 09:02:01PM *  0 points [-]

Interesting. ....what is the generative recipe needed for?

Comment author: [deleted] 13 April 2015 01:08:02PM *  0 points [-]

Primarily for predicting how the "object" (ie: component of the universe) in question is going to act. Classifying (in the machine learning sense) what you see as a cat doesn't tell you whether it will swim or slink (that requires causal modeling). Also, causal knowledge confirmed by time-sequence observation seems to actually make classification a much easier problem: the causal structure of the world, once identifable, is much sparser than the feature-structure of the world. Every cause "radiates" information about many, many effects, so modeling the cause (once you can: causal inference is near the frontier of current statistics) is a much more efficient way to compress the data on effects and thus generalize successfully.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 14 April 2015 02:25:24PM 0 points [-]

Interesting, thanks.