eli_sennesh comments on Hedonium's semantic problem - LessWrong

12 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 09 April 2015 11:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 14 April 2015 07:37:57PM 1 point [-]

We should probably call it something like "causalism": using the word "real" to mean "that with which we could, in principle, interact causally." I include the "in principle" because there exist, for example, galaxies that are moving away from us so quickly they will someday leave our light-cone. We see their light today, and that's a causal interaction with the past galaxy where it used to be, but we understand enough about object permanence that we believe we have solid reason to infer there still exists a galaxy moving along the trajectory we witnessed, even when we cannot interact with it directly.