At this point I am just going to cease replying to any of your posts because this discussion has become patently absurd. You have resorted to citing weaknesses that are common to any protocol that the user is too lazy to verify the safety of.

The problem isn't directly in the specific vunerability but that you produce a crypto program and make false claims about it.

It's a standard for people who produce good crypto to care about vunerabilities of their software and don't overstate the capabilities of their software.

I have the patience to walk you through the basics of security, trust, cryptography, etc.

Your understand of trust is so poor that you said that PGP would have be known to be flawed for the possibility for information to be transmitted as Pentashagon and me claimed.

Most people who want to hide a picture on their phone likely don't need real security anyway so it's not bad if you make a few errors here and there.