Richard_Loosemore comments on Debunking Fallacies in the Theory of AI Motivation - LessWrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (343)
You answered your own question when you said:
Incorrect. It very much DOES have to be a general intelligence, and far from stupid, if it is going to be smart enough to evade the efforts of humanity to squelch it. That really is the whole point behind all of these scenarios. It has to be an existential threat, or it will just be a matter of someone walking up to it and pulling the power cord when it is distracted by a nice juicy batch of paper-clip steel that someone tempts it with.
Or, as Rick Deckard might have said:
"If it's an idiot, it's not my problem"
Its got to be smart enough to understood the difference between real paoerclips and fake signals on its input channels, 'smileys".