= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Luke_A_Somers comments on Debunking Fallacies in the Theory of AI Motivation - LessWrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (343)
I think you meant "provoking" arguments ... but that was not my intention.
Can you suggest a different word to replace "debunking" which conveys "exposing the falseness of an idea, or belief, which is currently being promoted by a large number of people, with serious consequences"?
I am open to changing the title, if that can be done, and if you can think of a word that conveys the intended meaning.
No, I really meant that you are providing arguments, and that had better have been your intention!
Your expanded wording doesn't really convey an openness to being argued-against.
Like, 'Here are some flaws I see in the argument presented' is one thing.
'Your idea is totally wrong, I will expose its falseness' is another.
Also, I'm not seeing the serious consequences of being overly cautious in respect to AI development.