I said:

How exactly do you propose that the AI "weighs contextual constraints incorrectly" when the process of weighing constraints requires most of the constraints involved (probably thousands of them) to all suffer a simultaneous, INDEPENDENT 'failure' for this to occur?

And your reply was:

I'd hazard a guess that, for any given position, less than 70% of humans will agree without reservation. The issue isn't that thousands of failures occur. The issue is that thousands of failures -always- occur.

This reveals that you are really not understanding what a weak constraint system is, and where the system is located.

When the human mind looks at a scene and uses a thousand clues in the scene to constrain the interpretation of it, those thousand clues all, when the network settles, relax into a state in which most or all of them agree about what is being seen. You don't get "less than 70%" agreement on the interpretation of the scene! If even one element of the scene violates a constraint in a strong way, the mind orients toward the violation extremely rapidly.

The same story applies to countless other examples of weak constraint relaxation systems dropping down into energy minima.

Let me know when you do understand what you are talking about, and we can resume.