Error comments on Autism, or early isolation? - LessWrong

17 Post author: JonahSinick 17 June 2015 08:52AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Error 17 June 2015 03:13:49PM 2 points [-]

Asperger's Syndrome (which is no longer considered a valid construct...)

I'm curious what replaced it, if anything. It certainly seems to describe a real cluster in personspace. Was it just promoted to an unfortunate but non-disordered personality trait?

The tragedy is that none of the super high IQ societies created thus far have been able to meet those needs, and the reason for this is simple. None of these groups is willing to acknowledge or come to terms with the fact that much of their membership belong to the psychological walking wounded.

I came across this same essay some years ago, though I think it was on a different site. The phrase "Psychological walking wounded" has stuck with me ever since. It's just too poignantly accurate a description of my sociomental life to forget.

(it is interesting that this post shows up at a time when I'm trying to arrange psychological appointments to work on this and related issues...)

Comment author: Lumifer 17 June 2015 03:19:20PM 1 point [-]

I'm curious what replaced it, if anything.

Basically, the two large sub-categories of autism are (1) when speech is impaired; and (2) when speech is not impaired.

Asperger's is the old name for the unimpaired-speech version. Note that, generally speaking, impairment of speech is associated with delays in general mental development.

Comment author: Tem42 21 June 2015 06:54:36PM 0 points [-]

I think you have (1) and (2) reversed. Also, verbal communication is impaired on all three levels.