Lumifer comments on Monthly Bragging Thread July 2015 - LessWrong

7 Post author: elharo 01 July 2015 11:07AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 16 July 2015 04:38:19PM *  2 points [-]

Is that a personal impression or a memory of research that you can't find at the moment?

Memory of research. I don't know enough trust-fund kids to have a personal impression.

"Adversity builds character"

We're talking about a slightly different thing: the need for external motivation. The point isn't that for proper character development you should spend your youth going to school barefoot in the snow uphill both ways. The point rather lies in establishing the pattern and the expectation that if you want something, you should be prepared to pay for it in work (time, effort, resources), that some desires are too expensive this way, and that the amount of work you're prepared to do limits the things you can get.

If, as a kid or a teenager, you don't get any practice in limiting your wants and in pushing yourself to get something, you do not develop the appropriate "muscles" and so grow up lacking in abilities to control your desires and push yourself over the internal whining of "but I don't wanna".

Note that I'm not arguing that poverty is better. I am arguing that growing up without any financial constraints is not all rainbows and unicorns and brings with it its own set of problems.

Comment author: Gram_Stone 16 July 2015 05:29:00PM 0 points [-]

Gotcha. I'd sure be interested in seeing empirical evidence demonstrating a link between socioeconomic class, parenting style, and/or impulse control and self-discipline.

Comment author: Lumifer 17 July 2015 03:46:47PM *  1 point [-]

It's complicated :-)

The problem is that there is considerable genetic component in "impulse control and self-discipline" and it also affects your (and your parents') socioeconomic class. And additional problem is that the effects of parenting style are asymmetric -- it's relatively easy to royally screw up a kid, but it's very hard to improve a kid beyond his/her genetic baseline. Yet another problem is that certain possible outcomes of studying this topic are politically incorrect and likely to lead to... undesirable career consequences for the researcher.