Did you do anything clever to demonstrate that the survey award recipient was really chosen randomly?
No; I did think about it for a while since I would've liked to have an excuse for more hash precommitments and whatnot, but I couldn't think of any meaningful way to do it without harming participation.
You can use the Bitcoin blockchain for verifiable randomness, but there's no way to prove I didn't edit or sort the survey results to put a sock puppet account in it. I could release a signed copy of the survey data and commit to a blockchain hash for choice, but then I would have had to release the Bitcoin addresses & emails (because otherwise it's not ...
“Receive my instruction, and not silver; and knowledge rather than choice gold. / For wisdom is better than rubies; and all the things that may be desired are not to be compared to it.”
Sorted by topic:
Darknet market related:
Statistics & decision theory:
resortertool for statistically re-ranking a set of ratingsQS related:
sleep correlations:
Tech:
Debunking:
gwern.net-related:gwern.netCSS to be mobile-friendly; should now be readable in an iPhone 6 browserA/B testing: