Capla comments on Against Maturity - LessWrong

28 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 18 February 2009 11:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Capla 22 October 2014 04:30:02PM 1 point [-]

Why should I pretend to be mature when practically every star in the night sky is older than I am?

Practically? Or am I missing the reference?

Comment author: Jiro 22 October 2014 04:37:00PM 1 point [-]

As I've pointed out before, people on the Internet are depressingly literal, so any argument needs to be full of useless qualifiers to prevent it from getting pounced on by people who don't understand context. If he didn't say that, some idiot probably would have asked him how he didn't know that some object in the sky was 49.9999% to stardom last year and 50.0001% to stardom this year.

Comment author: Capla 22 October 2014 04:40:59PM 0 points [-]

I am assuming, that Eliezer know more than I do, but in order for there to be a star in the sky that is younger than him, it would need to both have formed within about 30 years and be within 30 light-years. That seems to be an improbable combination.

A cursory internet search (hindered by Google recognizing "star" to mean "actor") reveals no new near stars. Anyone want to enlighten me?

Comment author: Lumifer 22 October 2014 05:26:42PM 2 points [-]

One reasonable approach would be to interpret "young star" as a "star that recently became visible to the naked eye".

By the way, a question -- as far as I understand the standard way for a new star to form is to have a cloud of matter gravitationally aggregate into a sufficiently dense object which then ignites. Is the ignition a short event -- how long does it take? In other words, is there a sharp boundary between a "dense cloud, not yet a star" and a "young star"?

Comment author: Nornagest 22 October 2014 06:01:41PM *  1 point [-]

Is the ignition a short event -- how long does it take? In other words, is there a sharp boundary between a "dense cloud, not yet a star" and a "young star"?

It takes a while, although it's relatively short compared to a star's lifetime -- about ten million years for a solar-mass star, followed by a longer period as a young star that's still gaining energy from gravitational collapse. Higher-mass stars form faster, but I wouldn't expect even the heaviest to form on human timescales.

A complication from an observer's perspective is that this sort of thing usually happens inside dense clouds which block out young stars in the visible spectrum. Most of what we know about star formation, we know because of observations at longer wavelengths.