Let's have a meetup a talk a bit about rationality and rationalism in Brazil!

This is not a LessWrong only event (afaik, there are not many LWers around here), so any news and discussions about the meetup will happen primarily in the facebook event:

https://www.facebook.com/events/815839175152653/815899785146592/

Please join us there!

Proposed activities are: - Short talks (~20min) about organizations and projects to spread rationality raise the sanity waterline; - Discussion tables about interesting stuff

Again, please join the event on Facebook!

Welcome to the first meetup of Moscow LW lecture centre (don't mix up with LW club, which meets in Yandex). It will be in antikafe "PVK Kopernik" ( http://clubkopernik.ru/ ). Nearest metro is Shabolovskaya, then 15 minutes walking. Meetup begins at 14:00, the length is 2-4 hours.

Our plan:

1. Talk "Applicability of linear and parametric approach in science and thinking".
2. Talk "Deliberate practice: how are skills being improved".
3. Fallacymania game, details about this game are here: https://lesswrong-ru.hackpad.com/Fallacymania--neGfMe9MFjH

Details about meetup: https://lw-msk-lect.hackpad.com/-25--34L96i0tS5J

Where? Cafe Niespodzianka, Marszałkowska 7, 00-626 Warszawa

When? Vote and decide: http://doodle.com/t28anzntaczs8nwi

If you use Facebook, join our local group: www.facebook.com/groups/lwwarsaw

Bath, UK will be having its second meetup this Sunday 2nd November at 14:00 in the King of Wessex, which is a Wetherspoons pub in the city. I shall wait at least ninety minutes (i.e. until 15:30) for the first arrivals.

I'll put a sheet featuring a paperclip and saying 'Less Wrong' on the table so you know you've found us. Make sure you venture into the pub, since there's no guarantee our table will be near the door.

In case you need to contact me (e.g. if the venue is unexpectedly busy and we have to move elsewhere and you can't find us), my mobile number is the product 3 x 3 x 23 x 97 x 375127, preceded by a zero (so eleven digits total).

We have a Facebook group.

At the start we'll chat for a bit, then move onto an agreement exercise: Unlike last meetup, where we made predictions for our own PredictionBook accounts somewhat independently without necessarily sharing all our information, this time we shall try to reach consensus in our probabilities and then see how our consensus is calibrated, by means of a single PredictionBook account for the meetup group.

After that, we shall discuss ideas for future meetups and activities. In particular, we shall discuss how we can move forward with practical meetups and instrumental rationality, and how to balance this with discussion and 'abstract' or epistemic stuff.

====Previous meetup (2014-10-19 Sunday)====

It went well. There was me, someone who tagged along with me, someone from Bristol, and someone from Bradford-on-Avon. I think everyone had arrived by 14:30, and we probably stayed until 17:30 or 18:00. (We stayed long enough that we all got something to eat in the pub.)

We got to know each other a bit then did 15 predictions. The previous night, I had prepared a list of prompts for things to make predictions about, ranging from things where I thought we might have very high (or low) confidences, to things where I expected that most of the attendees would be basically indifferent (e.g. whether an even or odd number of elements have been observed, whether the density of water is above or below 1kg per liter, etc.).

We skipped some of the ambiguous prompts, and for a couple we had to sort of figure out what we'd use to judge the prediction midway through. I'd state the prompt, then where necessary we'd pin it down into something we could judge objectively enough. There might be some brief discussion, but we weren't trying to share all our information. I would type in (but not submit or write my probability for) the final wording of the prediction on PredictionBook. At a suitable point, when everyone understood what we were predicting and how it would be judged, I would give 90 seconds for everyone to stop communicating and log their final probabilities. I'd then type in my probability and create the prediction on Predictionbook, then we'd go round stating the probability we'd written down.

Some of the prompts were intentionally underspecified. For example, the first prediction was about Wladimir Klitschko's mass. In that case we each independently (to avoid priming) wrote down a figure (after explaining who he is, of course). Then we took the usual mean of the figures to obtain a 'wisdom of crowds' estimate and used that as the mass for the prediction.

(If you're worried that averaging the guesses would lead everyone to put 50% probability on the proposition, then you can shift by some amount to encourage more extreme confidences. But remember that it's still useful to test calibration at the 50% level!)

That was one of the cases where we had to decide partway through how we were going to judge the prediction, since we realised his mass would fluctuate a lot depending on e.g. whether he'd cut weight for a weigh-in. We agreed that if Google gave a unique figure and it seemed plausible, then we'd go with that. I'm not certain, but I don't think we actually shifted the average in this case, and the mean of our initial guesses turned out to be exactly correct (110kg).

In some cases, where the initial estimates varied wildly, I suggested we use a 'logarithmic average', i.e. use the exponential of the mean of the logarithms of the estimates, i.e. exp(arithmetic_mean(log(estimates)).

Then we'd check the prediction and I'd mark it Right or Wrong accordingly on Predictionbook. When they got home, the others marked the prediction Unknown, then put in the probability they'd made a note of, then re-mark the prediction as Right or Wrong as before.

I had my laptop and used the pub's Wi-Fi to create the predictions on PredictionBook with my estimate. The others made a note of their probabilities. After each prediction, we checked the prediction and I marked it Right or Wrong on PredictionBook accordingly. When they got home, each of the others who attended then marked the prediction Unknown, then submitted their probability from earlier, then re-marked the Prediction as Right or Wrong.

THINK is an effective altruism/rationality group that meets during the school year at Stanford. This is our third year. Most attendees are Stanford students, but anyone is welcome.

This week's discussion topic is rationality habits (from CFAR's checklist); we usually have a few games and structures activities and then allow them to dissolve into unstructured discussion.

I invite you to participate in a meetup next week; exact date will be chosen by voting here: http://doodle.com/2dshyg6hqbth72zvnp96sa73/admin#table. Time and place will be posted here later.

If you use Facebook, please join our local group for better coordination: https://www.facebook.com/groups/lwwarsaw/

It's time to gather together and remember the true Reasons for the Season: axial tilt, orbital mechanics and other vast-yet-comprehensible forces have converged together to bring another year to a close, and as the days grow shorter and colder we remember how profoundly lucky we are to have been forged by blind, impersonal forces into beings that can understand, and wonder, and appreciate ourselves and each other. This year's East Bay Rationalist Winter Solstice will be held in the center of Berkeley, bringing 300 rationalists together in a theatre hall for food, songs, speeches, and conversations. We encourage other Bay denizens who can't make our solstice to put on their own show. Or even if you do come, we encourage people to try out their own ideas. The East Bay Solstice celebration will be on Saturday, December 17th, in the Anna Head Alumnae Hall in Berkeley. Acquire tickets here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2016-bay-area-winter-solstice-tickets-27853776395 We are coordinating with the Bayesian Choir and will be coordinating with various speakers, as in previous years. An MC and schedule will be posted as details solidify. Kids are welcome. Vegetarian food will be available. Let us know if you have specific accomadation requests or have questions.

Idaho exists! This is the first Boise meetup I can find evidence of.

Topic: Introductions, getting to know each other. What brought you here?

Encontro mensal de LessWrongers em SP no café Vanilla. Como sempre, novatos são bem vindos!

(Facebook event: https://www.facebook.com/events/1064379460250772/)

Greetings! I haven't done one of these for far too long, but it's back. Tell us what you've learned recently, ask for rationalist advice, talk about cool stuff, and so on. I'll post a Google Hangouts link on Facebook close to the time.

We tend to go until late, so if you can't make it for the official time, you're welcome to pop in anyway.

People outside Australia are welcome too! We've heard from New Zealanders, South Americans, Europeans, North Americans...

Time zone is 7.30pm Canberra/Melbourne/Sydney, 6.30pm Brisbane.