Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Comment author: Alejandro1 19 May 2013 02:57:46PM *  1 point [-]

Yes, many of those words and their role as class shibboleths are discussed in Fox's book as well. IIRC, according to her in some cases there are three levels; either three different words for one thing used in lower, middle and upper classes, or (matching the counter-signaling in the gnome story) the same word being used in the lowermost and the uppermost classes.

Comment author: Alejandro1 04 May 2013 06:11:05PM 5 points [-]

See also: Lent.

Comment author: Alejandro1 28 April 2013 02:50:27AM 13 points [-]

This seems related to Robin Hanson's concept of "pulling sideways",. Some questions (e.g. income tax levels or gay marriage) get privileged because the alternative answers align with pre-existing political coalitions, so they give people an opportunity to cheer for their side and against the Enemy, whereas other questions whose answers would involve "pulling sideways" are ignored.

Comment author: Alejandro1 16 April 2013 04:31:38PM 1 point [-]

Complete anarchy as the degenerate case of a government system?

Sleeping on the floor as the degenerate case when discussing different kinds of beds and mattresses?

Asexuality as the degenerate case of hetero/homo/bi sexuality?

Comment author: Alejandro1 22 March 2013 03:51:36AM *  0 points [-]

I wonder where The Adventures of Tom Sawyer should be?

I say Gryffindor. Tom is obviously a Gryffindor, and though the tone of the book is somewhat mocking, he is nevertheless clearly the hero and triumphs in the end. (As far as I remember at least; I haven't read it since I was a child).

Yet Twain's ouvre spans all Houses: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is Hufflepuff, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court is Ravenclaw, and The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg is Slytherin.

Comment author: Alejandro1 21 March 2013 09:56:43PM 3 points [-]

More discussion of it here.

Comment author: Alejandro1 19 March 2013 05:02:07PM 2 points [-]

I see your point, but I agree with Desrtopa's reply. I would go further and say that Arq'f ubabe abg bayl snvyrq gb cerirag pvivy jne, vg npgviryl pnhfrq vg (ol jneavat Prefrv bs jung ur unq qvfpbirerq, naq yngre erwrpgvat Erayl'f naq Yvggyrsvatre'f zber frafvoyr cynaf sbe nibvqvat one). So I think he makes more sense as an example for Slytherins of how Gryffindor values are foolish and counterproductive.

Comment author: Alejandro1 19 March 2013 01:56:12PM 3 points [-]

The Strategy of Conflict is in both Slytherin and Gryffindor. I guess Jesse had two copies.

Comment author: Alejandro1 18 March 2013 11:03:36PM 13 points [-]

Most fantasy books might be Gryffindor, but A Game of Thrones? Totally Slytherin.

Comment author: Alejandro1 12 March 2013 01:19:17AM 6 points [-]

As far as I know, it was mostly because in his last decades he focused his research mostly on obtaining a classical field theory that unified gravity and electromagnetism, hoping that out of it the discrete aspects of quantum theory would emerge organically. Most of the forefront theoretical physicists viewed this (correctly, in retrospect) as a dead end and focused on the new discoveries on nuclear structure and elementary particles, on understanding the structure of quantum field theory, etc.

Einstein's philosophical criticism of quantum theory was not the reason for his relative marginalization, except insofar as it may have influenced his research choices.

View more: Next