Comment author: RobertLumley 11 May 2012 06:23:36PM 9 points [-]

Thank you for your apology. While you weren't rude to me, since I didn't get in on any of this, I had been pretty heavily downvoting you for your hostility. I was planning on looking through the thread in more detail to make sure I hadn't missed anything I thought should be downvoted, but I'm going to refrain from doing that now, and I've removed some downvotes I had made.

Comment author: Aurini 10 June 2012 07:23:41AM 3 points [-]

That is decent of you, sir.

Nonetheless, I do not believe that this is the place for me. I support and admire your mission of raising the Rationality Waterline, but I am a man who belongs in the trenches. Best I can do is use your Dark Side teachings, and send the occasional padwan in your direction to learn the Vicious Arts.

Grant me your prayers as I fight against the insufferable Good within the world.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 May 2012 10:58:55PM 3 points [-]

I have a habit of retracting my comments once I no longer agree with my past self. You might find that a worthwhile endeavour.

In response to comment by [deleted] on Is Race Realism Racist?
Comment author: Aurini 10 June 2012 07:17:35AM 2 points [-]

Oh, believe me, I shit the bed on this.

I was still all ornery from the last time here; I let that get into my blood, and overreacted. I've only recently attained any internet prominence, and this was my first time experiencing hate. Despite all the mental preparations... I reacted poorly.

I prefer to own my failures, however; I fucked up three weeks ago. Anyone can see that.

As I said to another commenter - I suspect that I am better as a beacon for rationality, pointing new pilgrims to his place, than I am a member of the community.

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 11 May 2012 04:32:42PM 9 points [-]

I was incredibly polite on the last debate; I still got downvoted.

I've just glanced at your whole list of comments. Unless I missed a page or something, I'm not seeing you get significantly downvoted in any systematic way in past discussions.

Either way, whether you were treated rightly or wrongly in the past, right now you're just being absolutely horrible and trollish, and your current behaviour would easily cause you to deserve to get banned, not just downvoted.

Comment author: Aurini 11 May 2012 04:34:30PM 4 points [-]

I just apologized. F5 the page.

Comment author: Aurini 11 May 2012 04:20:58PM *  37 points [-]

I was too much of an asshole; here it is in comment form.

I'm taking a 24 hour break, thom. I was over worked up, and I let it spill into this comment thread, overreacting to what people said.

I've probably acted like a jerk. not completely devoid of purpose, but a jerk nonetheless. I'd like to apologize for all of that. I had no call to be so rude to all of you.

Gah. I suppose I should repost this to the top.

Comment author: thomblake 11 May 2012 03:50:45PM 8 points [-]

I have no interest in addressing your video. That is not my purpose here. I saw you making what looked like a mistake, and felt the need to point it out. I also pointed out confusing parts of your comment in hope that you could resolve the confusion.

I have no interest in insulting you or making fun of you, nor have I done so. I also have no interest in "getting laid", and I'd prefer you keep your opinions regarding my private life to yourself.

And nobody's been here longer than me.

Comment author: Aurini 11 May 2012 04:11:25PM *  12 points [-]

Delete: hopefully nobody saw that.

I'm taking a 24 hour break, thom. I was over worked up, and I let it spill into this comment thread, overreacting to what people said.

I've probably acted like a jerk. not completely devoid of purpose, but a jerk nonetheless. I'd like to apologize for all of that. I had no call to be so rude to all of youl

Gah. I suppose I should repost this to the top.

Comment author: thomblake 11 May 2012 03:28:49PM 8 points [-]

Note that the argument on my video isn't the video itself - it's whether the video is appropriate or not.

It's generally considered acceptable here to comment on style and presentation, and posters generally appreciate the feedback. It's... weird, to put it lightly, that you are responding to neutral-toned feedback with hostility.

This place likes to pretend that it's counter-norm, but it parrots the university line at the drop of a hat.

I'm not sure what you mean by "counter-norm", or why this place would like to pretend it is that.

Perfect soviet doublespeak.

I'm confused. I thought I knew what "doublespeak" was - a rhetorical technique described in 1984 wherein one simultaneously asserts a proposition and its opposite - and I don't see how the above would qualify.

Comment author: Aurini 11 May 2012 03:41:05PM -12 points [-]

Protect your ego! Insult the outsider! Even if he's been here longer than you...

Clearly he is a fascist.

Listen: are you a man with integrity or not? Address the video I posted. I rewrote the intro and others on here have a transcript. You have no excuses to continue the personal attack. Either address my argument... or make fun of me, and get rep points.

The prior will make you smarter; the latter will get you closer to getting laid.

Choose.

Comment author: katydee 11 May 2012 03:34:01PM 3 points [-]

I feel I was no more hostile than-- to use your argument-- someone judging a competent black doctor as incompetent thanks to their priors about affirmative action.

Comment author: Aurini 11 May 2012 03:36:44PM -8 points [-]

That's rassist!

Also, far less rational than you ought to pride yourself on being; but I didn't expect rationality from LessWrong, so I'm not disappointed!

Comment author: GLaDOS 11 May 2012 03:20:30PM *  7 points [-]

Ok now I think you might be trolling or trying to be cool and ironic. I don't like either.

Comment author: Aurini 11 May 2012 03:31:50PM -13 points [-]

But can't one do all three?

Sometimes the truth can only be spoken through ugliness and riddles. I am Tyrion Lannister. You're breaking my heart, GLaDOS. At best, I hoped to find Bronn in this LW company of rascals - and then I saw Shae. Beautiful, woundrous, Shae; her mere being an argument to right myself, to be a better man... and now Shae speaks against me?

Should I apologize for the nature of my being? A man of pure fire, hate, truth, and humour? Should I wreck it all?

For you?

Would you still love me if I did all that? Would anyone love me?

Better to remain a misfit...

Comment author: JoshuaZ 11 May 2012 03:03:38PM 7 points [-]

GLaDOS, you are the first girl-computer to give me a bRoner.

The mind truly is the sexy organ, even for a playa like myself.

This sort of comment reinforces negative stereotypes pretty badly. There's a perception that people who self-identify as "race realists" are often simply smart versions of "bros" and have generally sexist attitudes. How much of that is due to halo effects and tribal allegiance issues isn't clear. But this sort of comment really doesn't help matters.

I may have to trust you to post the videos full of Truth

Capitalizing truth is never a good sign. If you feel a need to do it, it may be a good moment to step back from the keyboard and think carefully about what you believe, why you believe it, and how to most effectively communicate those reasons to people who may not agree.

Comment author: Aurini 11 May 2012 03:19:37PM -6 points [-]

Remind me, JoshuaZ - who is the Pretntious Writer who captilizes Truth and Many Other Words, and has subcribers... and who is the pretentious prick who comments upon standards of writing behaviour?

You can burn in hell; GLaDOS is a bloody lady, and sexy as the day is long. She has class and internet bearing - something you clearly lack. I also suspect that you do not own a motorcycle. If you did, you'd be giving me an internet high-five, bro, and we'd be rocking out on skype, like True Men. Instead you argue with me about something that has no bearing to the topic at hand.

I detect someone who seeks reputation points.

Comment author: Multiheaded 11 May 2012 02:28:49PM 2 points [-]

I'm not your spouse, dude.

Comment author: Aurini 11 May 2012 02:56:56PM -7 points [-]

You need to pick a side. Shit disturbing is only successful for so long.

View more: Next