WHAT? "Subtlety understanding"? You're over-reading me, I meant no more than I just said; even when I disagree with people who hold your views (alt-right, "racial realists", etc) in other regards, I've always found your line on the racial question mostly solid and decent.

Check out my comment history I'm an evil "racist" too. I don't get down voted though.

Oh I'm sure the downvotes for the main articles are almost entirely from newbs to the topic who are shocked SHOCKED to see this argument. And people who are thinking "this is true but I can't have this on LW main it looks bad to non-LWers!". And now that its in negative numbers people will dog pile on it (happens to most)... and that isn't so much your fault (though I guarantee you you would have had a better response in discussion).

But in some of the later comments about the meta level you really did responded badly. You don't seem to be currently calibrated to what kind of style LW posters want. Don't worry it gets back to you after a while. (^_^)

Something argument-ish can be found here.

There is an interesting truth-seeking-vs-consequentialism discussion to be had here, but I'll just let the rest of your comment slide.

Sure, sure, I believe you. I never played the racism card on any of you HBD people.

You filthy degenerate hypocrite.

Dude, THAT's why you're getting downvoted (I'm not doing it right now, but others do). Not because of the substance of your arguments, but because we don't address fellow members like that.

This might or might not be so, however, if you suddenly saw strong evidence to the contrary, would you hold the genetically afflicted race in disgust and contempt, treating it as having less moral worth than the more fortunate races? Or would you try to help its members eliminate the unwanted cultural/behavioral differences (without necessarily harming yourself in any way)?

It implies that people who reject their claims are not being real. I want to be a realist, but I certainly have seen no evidence that any particular race is more likely to commit unscrupulous acts if you control for environment (if that was even possible). It's a propaganda term, like '[my cause] realist.'

Downvoted for use of the term 'race realism' (that's verbal bullying).

(Based on metatroll's transcript (thanks!).)

[EDIT: expanded, original below.]

Unfortunately, you seem to fall prey to the usual errors:

• you do not mention high-education-results subcultures. Analyzing educational results leads to the non-mainstream and actionable-to-you result "tiger moms are awesome" (one prominent LWian does think in that direction). However, when race realists do this analysis, they always conclude (only) "blacks suck". (To be explicit: you've been hanging with white supremacists.)
• parents' social standing is highly influential. Serious civil rights legislation has only been in place for fifty years or so; there are huge confounding factors when inferring "inherent" intelligence from current life outcomes, which should at least be mentioned.
• name-calling is not an argument.
• you rail against feminism, but that seems somewhat unrelated. More importantly, women do pretty well in society (in particular, in the educational outcomes you cited above), so a straight "black people are poor - women are poor, too" analogy seems to fall flat. (This also furthers the impression that you've been hanging with a particular kind of white dude.)
• "affirmative action discriminates against whites" is not a fair and full evaluation of that policy, since that is indeed exactly what it's supposed to do. Your "awesome black doctor" is an argument against affirmative action, but you have not really engaged the core goal (improve chances for black people).

[Pre-EDIT: was: Unfortunately, you seem to fall prey to the usual errors: not mentioning Asian-American or other high-education-results cultures; not mentioning history; name-calling; linking it to unrelated causes including "men's rights"; attacking affirmative action without even considering whether the good outweighs the bad.]

I think there exists in hypothetical-discussion-post-space a worthwhile discussion of this topic, but this post is almost certainly not it.