Comment author: ikrase 01 July 2013 08:25:34AM 1 point [-]

Does Imperius provide remote control, or simply obedience to mundane orders? What does self-inflicted Imperius do?

Comment author: Axel 01 July 2013 12:42:09PM 8 points [-]

What does self-inflicted Imperius do

The cure to procrastination?

Comment author: MarkusRamikin 01 July 2013 06:35:03AM *  2 points [-]

What will it take to give Harry a breakdown, to have him say, or think, "this is too much"?

At the start of this story he's human, vulnerable to stress; merely facing up to Minerva McGonagall is enough to make him have to excuse himself and go retch. When I consider everything that's happened to that boy since then, it's a wonder he's not in need of therapy. But now his strength and sanity seem inhumanly unerodable; even Hermione's death immediately leads to an "unyielding resolution" that he's going to get her back.

Comment author: Axel 01 July 2013 12:37:56PM 4 points [-]

merely facing up to Minerva McGonagall is enough to make him have to excuse himself and go retch

This line has actually been changed to:

he grabbed the magical self-cleaning towel and, with shaky hands, wiped moisture off his forehead. Harry's entire body was sheathed in sweat which had soaked clear through his Muggle clothing, though at least it didn't show through the robes.

(at the end of ch6)

It doesn't take away from your point, just remarking that there are some details in the early chapters that have been changed.

Comment author: Alsadius 30 June 2013 09:27:07PM 2 points [-]

I'll agree that his rush to the combat is almost certainly an attempt to keep Harry alive. Unnecessarily, but he had no way of knowing that. But the troll attack seems to almost certainly be the doing of the person who used Hermione to attack Draco, and it's hard to believe that was anyone other than Quirrell.

Comment author: Axel 01 July 2013 12:27:19PM *  0 points [-]

I'll agree that his rush to the combat is almost certainly an attempt to keep Harry alive.

When going out of your way to turn a troll into an assassination tool, wouldn't you also instal some explicit instructions NOT to harm Harry Potter or anyone else vital to your future plans? At the very least the troll was ordered (imperio-ed?) to ignore any other victims and go straight for Hermione since it let Filch go. The fact that after killing his target the troll attacked anyone nearby makes me suspect Lucius, who has no reason to keep any Hogwarts student alive since his son is no longer there.

Comment author: linkhyrule5 01 July 2013 07:54:04AM 1 point [-]

Care to elaborate? Quirrel's involvement in this attack does not seem quite that intuitively obvious to me.

Comment author: Axel 01 July 2013 12:19:14PM *  3 points [-]

Quirel has often stated his dislike of Harry holding back because of silly things like "morality" and "what others might think of him". As Draco said in an early chapter: when confronted with a complicated plot look at what ends up happening and assume it was the intended outcome. Harry went fully into his dark side, switched off his censors and killed the troll in about 5 seconds. Even if Harry stayed behind in the Great Hall and learned about Hermione's death later it would still make him go to his dark side like never before. This benefits whatever Quirel's plan is.

Secondly, Eliezer likes to foreshadow things in hpmor. How many times have we heard characters say something like: "always suspect the defense professor"? This alone hints at Quirel being the mastermind behind Big Evil Events.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 01 July 2013 03:28:34AM 4 points [-]

I was wondering whether a lot of exposure to superhero comics could have that effect, since very little (nothing at all?) is permanent in them.

Comment author: Axel 01 July 2013 11:48:56AM 2 points [-]

I also lacked any strong emotional reaction to Hermione's death and I have never read a superhero comic in my life. I fact, I've never had such a reaction to a fictional character's death in books, movies or games. While I do get immense enjoyment out of absorbing works of fiction, I never get 'caught up' in them to such a degree that the emotional part of my brain starts treating characters as real people.

Comment author: ShardPhoenix 23 June 2013 10:17:17AM 0 points [-]

June or July?

Comment author: Axel 23 June 2013 11:32:01AM 1 point [-]

That would be June as July 30th is a Tuesday

Comment author: Axel 22 April 2013 06:55:33PM 2 points [-]

Could you visit Brussels? We'd love to meet you.

Comment author: Axel 26 January 2013 11:06:49AM 3 points [-]

"You are not a real human but one of multiple simulations I'm running, your next response determines if I destroy humanity or not."

Comment author: Alicorn 25 January 2013 05:32:33AM 6 points [-]

I'll be a basilisk guinea pig if you still need one.

Comment author: Axel 25 January 2013 09:12:15AM 1 point [-]

Thanks :)

Comment author: [deleted] 24 January 2013 04:30:26PM 2 points [-]

Upvoted, but merely typing "AI FREED" does not actually free the AI, any more than merely saying to a human prisoner "I let you out" will free them from their jail cell. (Whereas "AI DESTROYED" is a plausible text substitute for wiping the AI's program or whatever.)

Comment author: Axel 24 January 2013 04:48:24PM 6 points [-]

Good point, if there was an AI FREED command AND the AI could rewire the console so that typing AI DESTROYED activates it, it could probably just free itself in the first place.

View more: Prev | Next