Comment author: ChristianKl 13 September 2013 07:19:31PM 4 points [-]

Sokal's paper brought up the possibility of a morphogenetic field affecting quantum mechanics, which sounds slightly less rigorous than a Discworld joke

The concept doesn't come from Sokal but from Rupert Sheldrake who used the term in his 1995 book (http://www.co-intelligence.org/P-morphogeneticfields.html).

There are plenty of New Age people who seriously believe that the world works that way.

Comment author: BIbster 24 September 2013 09:53:11AM *  3 points [-]

There are plenty of New Age people who seriously believe that the world works that way.

Or find it a reasonable / plausible theory... I'm married to one who evolved into one who reads that pseudo-science, instead of the Stephen Hawking she used to read 20 years ago...

Comment author: [deleted] 21 September 2013 09:46:48AM 4 points [-]

Can you identify the factors which caused you to give the statements in this article more credibility than you would have given to any random internet source of an unlikely-sounding claim?

Mostly, the fact that I don't know shit about biology, and the writer uses full, grammatical sentences, cites a few references, anticipates possible counterarguments and responds to them, and more generally doesn't show many of the obvious signs of crackpottery.

In response to comment by [deleted] on Rationality Quotes September 2013
Comment author: BIbster 24 September 2013 09:48:22AM 2 points [-]

This is exactly why I (amongst many?) find it so hard to separate the good-stuff from the bad-stuff. It's the way the matter is brought to you, not the matter itself. Very thoughtful way of bringing it, as Army1987 says, references, anticipation of counterarguments etc.