In response to comment by [deleted] on Open thread, August 4 - 10, 2014
Comment author: [deleted] 05 August 2014 10:06:03PM 0 points [-]

Nope, doesn't seem to work. (I am probably doing something wrong as I never used Greasemonkey before.)

In response to comment by [deleted] on Open thread, August 4 - 10, 2014
Comment author: Bakkot 05 August 2014 10:35:50PM *  1 point [-]

Just tested this on a clean FF profile, so it's almost certainly something on your end. Did you successfully install the script? You should've gotten an image which looks something like this, and if you go to Greasemonkey's menu while on a LW thread, you should be able to see it in the list of scripts run for that page. Also, note that you have to refresh/load a new page for it to show up after installation.

Oh, and it only works for new comments, not new posts. It should look something like this, and similarly for replies.

ETA: helpful debugging info: if you can, let me know what page it's not working on, and let me know if there's any errors in the developer console (shift-control-K or command-option-K for windows and Mac respectively).

Comment author: Creutzer 05 August 2014 08:39:00PM 1 point [-]

Great idea and nicely done! It also had the additional benefit of constituting my very first interaction with javascript because I needed to modify somethings. (Specifically, avoid the use of localStorage.)

Comment author: Bakkot 05 August 2014 08:46:53PM 0 points [-]

I'm curious what you used instead (cookies?), or did you just make a historyless version? Also, why did you need that? localStorage isn't exactly a new feature (hell, IE has supported it since version 8, I think).

Comment author: Bakkot 05 August 2014 02:34:00AM 21 points [-]

I wrote a userscript / Chrome extension / zero-installation bookmarklet to make finding recent comments over at Slate Star Codex a lot easier. Observe screenshots. I'll also post this next time SSC has a new open thread (unless Yvain happens to notice this).

Comment author: Bakkot 05 August 2014 02:22:27AM *  14 points [-]

I wrote a userscript to add a delay and checkbox reading "I swear by all I hold sacred that this comment supports the collective search for truth to the very best of my abilities." before allowing you to comment on LW. Done in response to a comment by army1987 here.

Edit: per NancyLebovitz and ChristianKl below, solicitations for alternative default messages are welcomed.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 July 2014 11:46:21AM *  4 points [-]

Sidetrack: I'm imagining a shock bracelet to discourage involvement in pointless internet arguments. How would it identify them?

That's probably a FAI-complete problem. See also: http://xkcd.com/810/

Would people use it?

A thing I would like is this. I would totally enable this on LW if it was an option. (And if someone volunteered to write a Firefox plugin to achieve the same client-side, they'd have all my gratefulness.)

In response to comment by [deleted] on Open thread, July 28 - August 3, 2014
Comment author: Bakkot 05 August 2014 02:12:58AM 6 points [-]

Done. Client-side version, that is.

Comment author: lmm 01 June 2014 05:14:56PM *  3 points [-]

Freakangels (comic/webcomic) - very pretty (particularly for a London resident who recognises the flooded setting), with a coherent storyline that ties up everything it opens, at least from the emotional side. Raises questions about power and responsibility, though the answers it gives are not the LW view. I really enjoyed it, but I know I weight worldbuilding and visuals more strongly than many people do.

In response to comment by lmm on June 2014 Media Thread
Comment author: Bakkot 01 June 2014 09:45:56PM 0 points [-]

I read that as it was ongoing! Second the recommendation, and I'd point out that it's written by Warren Ellis, who also wrote Transmetropolitan and Planetary and The Authority. If you like any of those, you'll probably like the others (I particularly like Transmetropolitan), and if you haven't read any, give one a shot. (FreakAngels is free online and much shorter than Transmetropoitan.)

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 01 April 2014 07:14:52AM 2 points [-]

Fanfiction Thread

Comment author: Bakkot 03 April 2014 10:16:56PM 3 points [-]

I've mentioned it before, but it's recently completed and hence bears bringing up again:

Embers, an Avatar: The Last Airbender fanfiction, is one of the best works I've read, fanfic or otherwise. At 750k words, it'll keep you entertained for a while. It features characters who are generally smart (at least some of them, and in ways generally more age- and culturally-appropriate than eg HJPEV) and significant fleshing out of the world, with the latter drawing heavily on the author's sometimes-cited research: see eg the author's notes at the end of chapter 30 (warning, slight spoilers, though nothing that will make sense out of context) or at the end of chapter 47 (somewhat more significant spoilers).

You don't need to have seen the show to know what's going on, but it'll help, and the show is worth a quick watch if you've got time on your hands anyway. Don't skip this work just because you don't have time for the show right now, though. Also, there's a prequel of sorts called "Theft Absolute", which is three orders of magnitude shorter and will not make much sense without the show; it's not necessary for Embers.

Comment author: [deleted] 16 March 2014 03:04:31AM 3 points [-]

Hyperlinked URLs are excellent if available but do not substitute for the rest of this information since these threads will likely outlive the location of some of the sources.

That's what archive.org is for. (Okay, it's not perfectly reliable, but...)

In response to comment by [deleted] on Rationality Quotes March 2014
Comment author: Bakkot 20 March 2014 04:28:19AM 2 points [-]

If you want to avoid that problem, whenever you post a link you should submit it to archive.org or archive.is.

Comment author: passive_fist 06 January 2014 11:08:24PM *  3 points [-]

That definition of 'racist' is what Yvain calls a non-central fallacy: http://lesswrong.com/lw/e95/the_noncentral_fallacy_the_worst_argument_in_the/

If you can definitively prove "the existence and possible importance of average group differences in psychological traits", then the true and rational position to take would be racism. Now, as far as I know or have researched, no conclusive arguments have been made for accepting racism. However, when you say 'racist', it conjures up images like this:

(EDIT: this picture was embedded; it's now linked instead)

http://motherboard-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/content-images/article/ironically-a-mans-face-can-tell-you-if-hes-likely-to-act-like-a-racist/048156b6350757d5b198262bdfb53d92_vice_630x420.jpg

Comment author: Bakkot 07 January 2014 01:57:07AM 2 points [-]

Didn't downvote you, but I'm willing to bet it was because you embedded an image rather than linking it.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 06 January 2014 05:47:15PM *  19 points [-]

Even if everyone's map is distorted, I think there is an important difference whether people try to update, or don't even try. Which is part of what this website is about.

In other words, I would be okay with an X-ist who says they could be convinced against X-ism by evidence, even if they obviously consider such evidence very unlikely.

(And I obviously wouldn't be okay with people suggesting that presenting an evidence against X-ism should be punished.)

Comment author: Bakkot 07 January 2014 12:40:37AM 2 points [-]

I strongly suspect that people who make the claim "no amount of evidence could convince me of not-X" have simply absorbed the meme that X must be supported as much as possible and not the meme that all beliefs should be subject to updating. I very much doubt that expressing the above claim is much evidence that the claim is true. And it's hard to absorb memes like "all beliefs should be subject to updating" if you are made to feel unwelcome in the communities where those memes are common.

View more: Prev | Next