Comment author: ChristianKl 27 May 2014 08:45:00AM 6 points [-]

How do you know that you have the same comprehension?

Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 28 May 2014 05:59:24PM 6 points [-]

I frequently give my friends detailed feedback and analysis on their writing. They know about my speed reading thing, and none of them have noticed any change in the quality of my feedback.

Comment author: Metus 28 May 2014 01:19:08PM 1 point [-]

Damn, that is a lession I forgot. Does anyone else experience this? Reading an article, agreeing with it being an interesting insight, forgetting it and then rediscovering it in a different context?

Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 28 May 2014 05:57:07PM 3 points [-]

This happened to me all the time before I started putting valuable insights into Anki. I find that 1 card per outstanding article or lecture and 1-3 cards per excellent book is about right. (This is the only thing I use Anki for.)

Comment author: Will_BC 27 May 2014 02:40:21AM 0 points [-]

Where did you learn these speed reading techniques?

Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 27 May 2014 07:07:51AM 0 points [-]

I leaned from Matt Fallshaw, who IIRC was using something loosely based on the Evelyn Wood method.

Comment author: Will_BC 26 May 2014 10:53:58PM 2 points [-]

Any advice on how to increase the amount I read without increasing the time I spend reading? I'm concerned that just trying to up the pace will lower my comprehension.

Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 27 May 2014 02:34:32AM 3 points [-]

My experience is that modern speed-reading techniques don't lower comprehension unless you get extremely fast (say, 900-1500 wpm). The exception is the very early stages, so it's good to practice on, e.g., mildly interesting fiction. After a couple of weeks with ~30 minutes of focused practice daily, I was reading at double my previous pace with the same comprehension.

Comment author: ColonelMustard 10 May 2014 01:17:00PM *  0 points [-]

Any word on this? We submitted applications ~6 weeks ago and it would be useful to find out who will be offered a spot.

Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 12 May 2014 10:16:38PM 0 points [-]

We're working on putting the guest list together. I'll notify people as soon as we have definite answers.

Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 29 April 2014 10:05:00AM 4 points [-]

Online stuff:

I have several friends in the DC area who I met because I made this post.

I found my job because I applied to a CFAR workshop, and that led me to attend the Effective Altruism Summit instead (funny story there), which is where I first met the team I work with.

Phil and Eliezer have critiqued my fiction, and I've done the same for Phil and Vaniver.

Meatspace stuff:

I met about a dozen good friends in Boston through LW meetups and lived with several of them before I moved to SF.

These days, my primary social group is maybe 50% self-identified rationalists and 100% people who are serious about existential risk and laugh at jokes about fundamental epistemology.

Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 27 April 2014 05:28:02PM 1 point [-]

What I still don't get is how to steer a conversation from small-talk phase to more personal topics - esp. in a group setting.

Rosenberg's book gave me a framework that I use to understand the feelings someone is experiencing and to communicate my own experience, which I think is what you mean by "personal topics." The differences between the first and second versions of Schelling Day are strongly informed by this framework, to give an (extremely mechanical and oversystematized) example.

In response to Schelling Day 2.0
Comment author: itaibn0 09 April 2014 10:02:17PM 6 points [-]

If your die shows a one, you MAY NOT speak

I suggest you change "MAY NOT" into "MUST NOT". The statement "you MAY NOT speak" could be misinterpreted to mean that you have the permission not to speak, which you do by default.

In response to comment by itaibn0 on Schelling Day 2.0
Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 09 April 2014 11:15:07PM 4 points [-]

Done!

In response to Schelling Day 2.0
Comment author: Vaniver 09 April 2014 05:41:33PM 4 points [-]

I note you've dropped the 'potluck' portion from last year. Is the primary motivation for that the peak-end rule, increased portability, or something else?

In response to comment by Vaniver on Schelling Day 2.0
Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 09 April 2014 05:58:10PM 4 points [-]

It's because of the peak-end rule. Last year, Boston's potluck started out with us following up on what people had shared, and then drifted to our usual conversation topics. I think there are still good reasons to eat a meal together, and good reasons for such a meal to be a potluck, but I'd recommend doing so before the event. I'll edit that in to the post.

Schelling Day 2.0

13 Ben_LandauTaylor 09 April 2014 06:58AM

Schelling Day is a holiday about getting to know the people in your community that we created and celebrated in 2013. By popular request, I've revised the procedure to take into account what we learned last year. I'm aware of plans to hold Schelling Day in Boston, New York, and San Francisco on April 16. (Not 14, because of the conflict with Passover, which is also a major community event for many people.) I'd love to know of any additional celebrations that you guys hold.

Last year's event played a part in the Boston group’s development into a closer and more caring community. Sharing the things you want to share, and receiving compassion and understanding from the group, turns out to be extremely powerful evidence that it’s safe to share important things with the group—and as it turns out, brains update if you give them good evidence.


Schelling Day

If necessary, split into groups of no more than 10-15 people. Each group gathers and sits in a circle. At the center is a table. On the table are four small bowls of delicious snacks. Eating the delicious snacks at this stage is VERBOTEN. There is also a single large, empty bowl.

Everyone will have a six-sided die.

Everyone will have a chance to speak, or to not speak. When it’s your turn, roll your die. Showing the result to others is VERBOTEN.

If your die shows a six, you MUST speak. If your die shows a one, you MUST NOT speak. Otherwise, you choose whether or not to speak. The die is to provide plausible deniability. Attempting to guess whether someone’s decision was forced by the die roll is VERBOTEN. 

If you speak, take up to five minutes[1] to tell the group something important about yourself. Then, choose at least one of the categories below that matches what you said. Scoop a small amount of the corresponding delicious snack from the small bowls into the central bowl. (If you want, you can use these categories for inspiration, but don’t let them restrict you from saying something that matters.)

 

Struggles (Chocolate):

Challenges, burdens, things you’re tired of hiding, etc.

 

Joys (Raspberries):

Passions, guilty pleasures, “I love you guys” speeches, etc.

 

Background (Grapes):

Who you are, where you came from, why you are the way you are, etc.

 

Other (Blueberries):

Because trying to make an exhaustive list would be silly.

 

People in the group now have an opportunity to empathize. This is not a time to offer suggestions or critique; this is a time to connect with another human’s emotions.[2]  The speaker can choose to agree with or to correct people’s perceptions, if they wish. Keep reactions brief and focused on the speaker’s experience. Try not to have more than 2-3 reactions per speaker.

After the group’s reactions, or after you choose not to speak, the person to your left rolls their die and the process repeats.

Once everyone has had a chance to speak or not, the round is over. Shake hands with the people on either side of you and take five minutes to stretch. Then do the same thing again, beginning across the circle from where the previous round started. (e.g., if there are ten people, then start with the person who spoke fifth or sixth last time.)

After that, take five minutes to stretch, then begin the BONUS ROUND.

The BONUS ROUND is like the first two rounds, with one exception. If you haven’t spoken yet, do not roll your die. You MUST speak.

When the BONUS ROUND finishes, pass around the bowl of snacks assembled from the accumulated revelations and eat them. As this is happening, people will talk about how they felt during the ritual and how they feel at this moment. Once people have shared their reactions, or once all the snacks are eaten, Schelling Day is over. There is one final group hug, and then everyone goes home.[3]


[1] The facilitator will use a timer. We’re not trying to be jerks, but we want to keep things moving.

 

[2] If you’re familiar with Nonviolent Communication (NVC), that will give you a sense of what to do here. Some templates you might use:

“When you said that [repetition of what they said] I imagined that you were [guessed feeling] because you want [guessed need].” E.g., “When you said that were struggling to make it, I imagined that you feel desperate because you want stability and security.”

“When you were talking, I noticed that [observation of what you noticed them do] and I sensed that you were [guessed feeling] because you long for [guessed need].” E.g., “When you were talking, I noticed that you were rocking slightly back and forth, and I sensed that you had a lot of contained frustration inside you. I imagine the frustration comes from that you want help and you aren't getting that, and it's contained maybe because you fear that lashing out will make things worse.”

 

[3] Hanging out after the hug is VERBOTEN—remember the peak-end rule! If you want to eat a meal together, you could do it before the event starts. (Potlucks are good, since people get to visibly contribute to the group.) If you absolutely must do something with the same people, then do it in a different location. Convince your System 1 that Schelling Day is over, and now you’re doing something else.

View more: Prev | Next