Comment author: [deleted] 03 December 2012 04:07:13AM *  18 points [-]

Mean 89222.75
Median 137.0

Somebody's being a douchebag.

If you don't like a topic, proper responses can include: 1) Don't participate, 2) Downvote, 3) Make a comment saying why you dislike discussion of the topic.

The proper response is NOT to sabotage the topic.

The reason this site maintains relatively high levels of rational discourse, rather than trolling and flame wars, etc, is because we all do our best to follow the social contract of this site. Breaking the contract (via actions such as sabotaging polls, karmassassination, etc) pushes the LW dynamic away from all the things we like (open, reasoned discussion, thoughtful ideas, etc) and towards the things we don't like (i.e. 4chan)

tl;dr- Don't be a douchebag.

In response to comment by [deleted] on LessWrong IQ Survey
Comment author: Blackened 03 December 2012 10:12:03AM 2 points [-]

We can still view the individual responses and ignore this one.

In response to LessWrong IQ Survey
Comment author: bbleeker 03 December 2012 06:08:41AM 2 points [-]

I think you mean NOT culture-based, right?

Comment author: Blackened 03 December 2012 10:06:04AM 2 points [-]

Yes. And I thought I reread the thing xD

In response to LessWrong IQ Survey
Comment author: NancyLebovitz 02 December 2012 11:24:17PM 4 points [-]

Minor point-- if you want links to look nice in articles, you need to use html rather than the markdown which is what works in comments. I don't know whether putting up with this is a sign that we're unusually intelligent.

Comment author: Blackened 02 December 2012 11:46:35PM 0 points [-]

Ahh. For some reason, I was convinced that the link worked before I edited my post, during the process of which I didn't touch the link. So I just left it there, out of frustration, it was clickable anyway. Fixed.

Maybe HTML does suggest something about LW's IQ, but it is not really useful, given the current evidence we have so far. The way I interpret it, it says that the average IQ is probably over 110-120 (no upper limit), with a quite weak reliability. Even if we don't take into account that 20-70% of the users know programming (many people don't study computer science, but still use programming).

Comment author: Tenoke 02 December 2012 11:00:03PM 2 points [-]

'but don't remember to convert it to SD15' did you mean don't forget?

In response to comment by Tenoke on LessWrong IQ Survey
Comment author: Blackened 02 December 2012 11:04:03PM 2 points [-]

Yes. Edited.

In response to LessWrong IQ Survey
Comment author: RobertLumley 02 December 2012 10:00:47PM 12 points [-]

I think this topic has pretty effectively been beaten to death already. What is the endgame of this discussion?

Comment author: Blackened 02 December 2012 10:32:32PM 3 points [-]

I couldn't find any relevant discussion on the topic. Can anyone give me a link?

I'm looking for one where people have posted their scores on a reliable IQ test, rather than answering to the question "what is your IQ?".

In response to LessWrong IQ Survey
Comment author: Blackened 02 December 2012 10:25:53PM *  2 points [-]

JCTI score

Please don't use this field for scores from other tests, except for clinical ones - note that there are some that are not free and are still not valid (one costed a few hundred Euros!). You can post scores from other tests if you are really sure they are valid, but don't forget to convert it to SD15. As far as I know, some Mensa admission tests are not accurate.

Submitting...

Comment author: Blackened 02 December 2012 10:30:02PM 0 points [-]

CFNSE score

Here is the percentile convertor for CFNSE. http://www.etienne.se/cfnse/norm.htm

Note that the best strategy is to look at Adults percentile, even if this is less accurate than the age group. We are looking at the intelligence compared to all humans, not compared to all humans at the same age range.

Submitting...

In response to LessWrong IQ Survey
Comment author: jsteinhardt 02 December 2012 10:23:12PM *  4 points [-]

You need to include the polls as a comment, rather than the main post.

EDIT: Would actually recommend having them as two separate comments.

Comment author: Blackened 02 December 2012 10:28:24PM 2 points [-]

Thanks.

In response to LessWrong IQ Survey
Comment author: Blackened 02 December 2012 10:25:53PM *  2 points [-]

JCTI score

Please don't use this field for scores from other tests, except for clinical ones - note that there are some that are not free and are still not valid (one costed a few hundred Euros!). You can post scores from other tests if you are really sure they are valid, but don't forget to convert it to SD15. As far as I know, some Mensa admission tests are not accurate.

Submitting...

Comment author: Blackened 02 December 2012 09:55:34PM 0 points [-]

I really wanted to come, but coursework deadlines are very close, so I had to skip this one. How did it go? How many people came?

LessWrong IQ Survey

1 Blackened 02 December 2012 09:53PM

The latest survey shows that the average LessWronger who entered his SAT or ACT is roughly in the top 0.11%. This is insanely high. For comparison, top 2% can be Mensa members. I do not know the correlation between SAT/ACT and IQ, but I know it's fairly high. Anyway, I'm very curious to see the average score on a real, culture-fair IQ test. Those are the only two tests that are free, online, correct and culture fair, from what I know.

 

http://www.cerebrals.org/wp/tests/jcti/

http://www.etienne.se/cfnse/

 

Many people would prefer not to have people knowing their scores. That's great, but please please please do post it anonymously. Especially if it's a low one, but not if it's low because you rushed the test.

JCTI might take a while, so I recommend keeping your answers on Notepad in case you want to leave it and continue later.

Edit: I have included polls, thanks to the commenters.

Post your score here: http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/fqq/average_iq_on_lw/7yad/

 

View more: Prev | Next