Comment author: Brihaspati 17 March 2012 01:45:38PM 0 points [-]

I think it may be time for Less Wrongers to begin to proactively, consciously ignore this troll. Hard.

Comment author: Yvain 13 March 2012 10:01:38PM *  29 points [-]

Imagine a group of 100 world-renowned scientists and military strategists. Could such a group easily wipe away the Roman empire when beamed back in time?

Imagine a group of 530 Spaniards...

At the risk of confirming every negative stereotype RationalWiki and the like have of us...have you read the Sequences? I'm reluctant to write a full response to this, but I think large parts of the Sequences were written to address some of these ideas.

Comment author: Brihaspati 14 March 2012 01:29:17AM 8 points [-]

I'm afraid I had the same reaction. XiXiDu's post seems to take the "shotgun" approach of listing every thought that popped into XiXiDu's head, without applying much of a filter. It's exhausting to read. Or, as one person I know put it, "XiXiDu says a lot of random shit."

Comment author: Brihaspati 16 September 2011 05:42:22AM 32 points [-]

If a book exists in PDF on the web somewhere, I estimate a 90% of chance of finding it by at least one of the following four methods, which altogether take only a few minutes if you're practiced at it:

  1. Search library.nu. (You'll have to sign up for a free account the first time.)
  2. Search Library Genesis.
  3. Search Scrapetorrent.
  4. Use a custom Google search and keeping clicking through links until you find a filesharing site link for the book - one that isn't broken yet.
In response to Your inner Google
Comment author: Teal_Thanatos 16 September 2011 12:41:59AM 8 points [-]

Hi, The post is short, sweet and get's the point across. However I feel it could be better with a little bit more information including multiple sources. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust,_but_verify

Comment author: Brihaspati 16 September 2011 05:33:40AM 3 points [-]

"All that your brain does when you ask it a question is hit "search" and return the first hit it finds" is saying roughly the same thing that Stanovich and other researchers have said about 'default to Type 1 processing', as explained recently in this post.