Capla

Solving sleep: just a toe-dipping

[For the past few months I’ve been undertaking a mostly independent study of sleep, and looking to build a coherent model of what sleep does and find ways to optimize it. I’d like to write a series of posts outlining my findings and hypotheses. I’m not sure if this is the best venue for such a project, and I’d like to gauge community interest. This first post is a brief overview of one important aspect of sleep, with a few related points of recommendation, to provide some background knowledge.] In the quest to become more effective and productive, sleep is an enormously important process to optimize. Most of us spend (or at least think we should spend) 7.5 to 8.5 hours in bed every night, a third of a 24 hour day. Not sleeping well and not sleeping sufficiently have known and large drawbacks, including decreased attention, greater irritability, depressed immune function, and generally weakened cognitive ability. If you’re looking for more time, either for subjective life-extension, or so that you can get more done in a day, taking steps to sleep most efficiently, so as to not spend more than the required amount of time in bed and to get the full benefit of the rest, is of high value. Understanding the inner mechanisms of this process, can let us work around them. Sleep, baffling as it is (and it is extremely baffling), is not a black box. Knowing how it works, you can organize your behavior to accommodate the world as it is, just as taking advantage of the principles of aerodynamics, thrust, and lift, enables one to build an airplane. The most important thing to know about sleep and wakefulness is that it is the result of a dual process: how alert a person feels is determined by two different and opposite functions. The first is termed the homeostatic sleep drive (also, homeostatic drive, sleep load, sleep pressure, and process S), which is determined solely by how long it has been since an individual has last slept fully. The longer he/she’s been awake, the g

63Jun 30, 2015

Capla

Message

1027

393

12y

Solving sleep: just a toe-dipping

Jun 30, 201563

Meetup : Chicago Rationality Training Group - Meeting 1: "Why Rationality?" and Using the Inner Simulator

Discussion article for the meetup : Chicago Rationality Training Group - Meeting 1: "Why Rationality?" and Using the Inner Simulator WHEN: 05 April 2015 01:00:00PM (-0500) WHERE: Harper Memorial Library, room 145. 1116 E 59th St, Chicago, IL 60637 The first meeting of the rationality training group will be at...

Mar 27, 20152

Interesting (or semi-interesting) part time jobs?

I'm currently taking time off from school to focus on my eduction. I'm reading (a lot), mastering some skills, and finishing some projects. It takes money to live, so I need money. I was considering what my options were for jobs that would keep me engaged, and I thought I'd...

Dec 29, 20146

The buildup to Jaynes?

Not too long ago, I asked LessWrong which math topics to learn. Eventually, I want to ask for what the prerequisites for each of those topics are and how I should go about learning them. This is a special case of that. I'm rereading the sequences and Eliezer seems to...

Dec 28, 201411

Memory Improvement: Mnemonics, Tools, or Books on the Topic?

I want a perfect eidetic memory. Unfortunately, such things don't exist, but that's not stopping me from getting as close as possible. It seems as if the popular solutions are spaced repetition and memory palaces. So let's talk about those. Memory Palaces: Do they work? If so what's the best...

Nov 21, 201413

Neo-reactionaries, why are you neo-reactionary?

Through LessWrong, I've discovered the no-reactionary movement. Servery says that there are some of you here. I'm curious, what lead you to accept the basic premises of the movement? What is the story of your personal "conversion"? Was there some particular insight or information that was important in convincing you?...

Nov 17, 20144

Can science come to understand consciousness? A problem of philosophical zombies (Yes, I know, P-zombies again.)

In response to the classic Mysterious Answers to Mysterious Questions, I express some skepticism that consciousness is can be understood by science. I postulate (with low confidence) that consciousness is “inherently mysterious”, in that it is philosophically and scientifically impenetrable. The mysteriousness is a fact about our state of mind,...

Nov 17, 20144

Load More (7/14)

LESSWRONG
LW

LESSWRONG
LW

Capla

Capla

Capla

Solving sleep: just a toe-dipping

The "best" mathematically-informed topics?

What math is essential to the art of rationality?

Podcasts?

Capla

Solving sleep: just a toe-dipping

Meetup : Chicago Rationality Training Group - Meeting 1: "Why Rationality?" and Using the Inner Simulator

Interesting (or semi-interesting) part time jobs?

The buildup to Jaynes?

Memory Improvement: Mnemonics, Tools, or Books on the Topic?

Neo-reactionaries, why are you neo-reactionary?

Can science come to understand consciousness? A problem of philosophical zombies (Yes, I know, P-zombies again.)

Solving sleep: just a toe-dipping

The "best" mathematically-informed topics?

What math is essential to the art of rationality?

Podcasts?

Solving sleep: just a toe-dipping

Meetup : Chicago Rationality Training Group - Meeting 1: "Why Rationality?" and Using the Inner Simulator

Interesting (or semi-interesting) part time jobs?

The buildup to Jaynes?

Memory Improvement: Mnemonics, Tools, or Books on the Topic?

Neo-reactionaries, why are you neo-reactionary?

Can science come to understand consciousness? A problem of philosophical zombies (Yes, I know, P-zombies again.)