Comment author: Chriswaterguy 24 June 2016 01:12:05PM 4 points [-]

Libertarianism secretly relies on most individuals being prosocial enough to tip at a restaurant they won't ever visit again.

I'm puzzled that you gave that specific example, given that it's obviously wrong. Most countries do not have a culture of tipping, and their economies don't implode. They just have less headaches at bill time. And in many cases (a long way from libertarianism) their wait staff get paid a living wage.

I'm also not sure what it means for libertarianism to rely on something, since libertarianism is not an actual functioning thing in existence. But if it did exist and function, it would not rely on tipping.

In response to Hand vs. Fingers
Comment author: Chriswaterguy 11 May 2016 10:45:11AM *  0 points [-]

When you pick up a cup of water... the force exerted by your hand must be zero.

Unless you are holding the cup up, supporting it against the force of gravity.

Comment author: James_Miller 03 April 2016 04:53:05AM *  6 points [-]

This shouldn't be down-voted if for no other reason then it shows that a regular contributor to LW got an article in a major paper that contains the following paragraph:

"Recent research shows that after any emotionally powerful event, our brains tend to assign too much weight to that event compared with what is really important to us, a thinking error called attentional bias. To fight this thinking error, we should consider what are our actual goals and how best to reach them."

Comment author: Chriswaterguy 05 April 2016 04:41:43AM -1 points [-]

Agreed - the article is remarkably rational for a mainstream media op-ed.

In response to Meetup : Null event
Comment author: Chriswaterguy 08 January 2016 12:06:35PM 0 points [-]

THESE DETAILS ARE INCORRECT. I'm trying to get this event deleted.

Comment author: Vaniver 07 January 2016 05:09:28PM 2 points [-]

You should see a "edit meetup" link underneath the map at that link.

Comment author: Chriswaterguy 08 January 2016 12:04:46PM 1 point [-]

Thank you. (In hindsight I should have done a page search for "edit".)

Comment author: philh 07 January 2016 05:57:30PM 1 point [-]

You should be able to edit it here: http://lesswrong.com/meetups/1ke (not from the discussion article).

There's a small 'edit meetup' link below the map.

Comment author: Chriswaterguy 08 January 2016 11:58:32AM 0 points [-]

Ah, thank you.

(Should have done a page search for "edit", now I think of it.)

Comment author: Chriswaterguy 07 January 2016 12:55:28PM 0 points [-]

Can I edit events that I created on Less Wrong?

It seems I can't. (I ask because I created this event, but when I pasted the details, I neglected to add the city (Melbourne). And now the map is wrong by about 3600km.

Comment author: Chriswaterguy 07 January 2016 12:51:47PM 0 points [-]

MELBOURNE! I forgot to write Melbourne, and the map incorrectly shows Perth. It seems I can't edit an event that I created.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 04 October 2012 10:06:03AM 5 points [-]

When I write a character, e.g. Draco Malfoy, I don't just extrapolate their mind, I extrapolate the surrounding subjective world they live in, which has that character at the center; all other things seem important, or are considered at all, in relation to how important they are to that character. Most other books are never told from more than one character's viewpoint, but if they are, it's strange how often the other characters seem to be living inside the protagonist's universe and to think mostly about things that are important to the main protagonist. In HPMOR, when you enter Draco Malfoy's viewpoint, you are plunged into Draco Malfoy's subjective universe, in which Death Eaters have reasons for everything they do and Dumbledore is an exogenous reasonless evil.

This is an awesome trick, and I'll have to use it more explicitly when writing various characters. (I already did somewhat, but I'm not sure if I've explicitly thought of it in these terms.)

Comment author: Chriswaterguy 29 December 2015 11:16:45AM 0 points [-]

The other writer who also does this extremely well is Vikram Seth, in A Suitable Boy.

Comment author: thomblake 04 October 2012 01:59:09PM 33 points [-]

"grass is green" and "sky is blue" are always funny examples to me, since whenever I hear them I go check, and they're usually not true. Right now from my window, I can see brown grass and a white/gray sky.

So they're especially good examples, as people will actually use them as paradigms of indisputably true empirical propositions, and even those seem almost always to be a mismatch between the map and the territory.

Comment author: Chriswaterguy 29 December 2015 11:03:56AM 1 point [-]

As an experiment, a couple raised their child without telling them what colour the sky was. When they eventually asked, the child... thought about it. Eventually... "white". (I'd assumed it was a clear sky. Just realised it's a pointless story if it was cloudy.)

Why Isn't the Sky Blue? - starts with colours in Homer.

View more: Next