Comment author: David_Gerard 06 September 2014 09:55:56PM *  7 points [-]

So why do women do worse in certain fields of work? It turns out you can in fact do a direct A/B comparison on workplace gender discrimination: ask a transgender person. Formerly respected scientist Barbara Barres, now inexplicably-more-respected scientist Ben Barres. Actual quote: "Ben gave a great seminar today—but then his work is so much better than his sister's."

Comment author: ChristianKl 05 September 2014 12:06:37AM 1 point [-]

When Googling on Social Europe I only find them using the term progressivism to refer to the US. They may speak about about progressive policies but not use the term progressivism when speaking about European policies.

In terms of the flawed left-right spectrum, progressivism is the ideology of those between the socialists and the center.

In the European context I haven't heard the word progressivism as referring to third way policies. Third way policies usually get justified by saying that we have no other choice instead of being justified by themselves shaping society as we want society to be.

I think the Social Justice movement came out of postmodernism and Woodrow Wilsons progressivism was modern in nature.

Comment author: David_Gerard 05 September 2014 01:56:49PM 5 points [-]

I think the Social Justice movement came out of postmodernism

The term approximately as we know it was used by Catholics in the 19th Century, coined in the 1840s by Jesuit priest Luigi Taparelli. (How we got from there to Tumblr is an interesting journey but an approximately continuous one.)

Comment author: blacktrance 05 September 2014 11:13:49AM 7 points [-]

I suspect that the neo-reactionary conception of "progressivism" is outgroup homogeneity bias at work.

Comment author: David_Gerard 05 September 2014 01:55:03PM 2 points [-]

c.f. the Cathedral, which is an attempt to frame the culture that the rest of us call "Western civilisation as it is now" as a conspiracy, or something enough like a conspiracy to speak of in the terms appropriate to one.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 05 September 2014 12:57:29PM 1 point [-]

Progressives tend to elevate human reason above all else.

Maybe LW progressives do. In general, isn't it libertarians who tend to be the coldly calculating ones?

Comment author: David_Gerard 05 September 2014 01:51:50PM *  4 points [-]

Compared to neoreaction, libertarianism and liberalism are virtually twins, as children of the Enlightenment.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 04 September 2014 06:25:08PM *  18 points [-]

The history of LW and NR is older than Scott's posts on the subject.

The plausible connection between LW and NR is that both have an underlying premise that life can be improved by taking a fairly abstract approach.

There were several active NR posters. They decided LW wasn't where they wanted to hang out, and some of them can be found at More Right..

Comment author: David_Gerard 05 September 2014 01:44:49PM *  6 points [-]

More specifically, I thought the main connection was (a) Moldbug frequenting OB (b) Mike Anissimov as the transhumanist neoreactionary. Was there more I've missed? (I know lots more of such showed up later.)

Comment author: Lumifer 27 August 2014 09:20:23PM 3 points [-]

That's a very very uncharitable interpretation of that sentence in the body of the bill.

Comment author: David_Gerard 28 August 2014 09:31:58PM 5 points [-]

I really don't think so. There's a pattern of this with creationists, c.f. Paul Broun condemning embryology as (literally) the work of Satan - which sounds truly weird unless you know how much e.g. Dawkins hammered on embryology as slam-dunk proof of evolution in The Greatest Show On Earth. This is another in a long series of bills attempting to get creationism a foothold in publicly-funded education, even if it has to be written entirely in dogwhistles. It may seem uncharitable in the evidence given (a single link), but not if you know the history of this sort of attempted legislative end-run.

Comment author: David_Gerard 28 August 2014 09:29:20PM 2 points [-]

.

Comment author: David_Gerard 27 August 2014 09:11:58PM 3 points [-]

The Fate of Galt's Gulch Chile, an experimental Objectivist community. Post is by a buyer.

Comment author: David_Gerard 27 August 2014 09:03:11PM 4 points [-]
Comment author: David_Gerard 18 August 2014 05:03:20PM 4 points [-]

Remember to give Kaj an upvote for this post :-)

View more: Prev | Next