Comment author: Kawoomba 13 August 2013 09:27:23AM 7 points [-]

(~700 mi/hr, 11000 km/hr)

No.

Comment author: Discredited 13 August 2013 10:59:00AM 6 points [-]

Ha, thanks. Fixed.

Comment author: solipsist 12 August 2013 11:55:43PM *  11 points [-]

It would be helpful if this article included a description or definition of Hyperloop.

Comment author: Discredited 13 August 2013 09:23:21AM *  12 points [-]

Big tube in the air rests on pylons / support towers. Maybe goes along a highway. Vehicle inside the tube has batteries for running a compressor. It pumps air away from its front to reduce air resistance, pumps below for suspension and behind. High subsonic speed (~700 mi/hr, 1100 km/hr). Accelerated by occasional linear induction motors on the tube, like a maglev train. Vehicle estimated to cost millions, tube estimated to cost billions. Conventional rails cost tens of billions. That's all from the abstract, much more inside.

Comment author: gothgirl420666 31 July 2013 07:31:15PM 18 points [-]

Why are so many rationalists polyamorous? I don't see why this idea is linked to the LW ideology, unlike transhumanism, atheism, effective altruism, etc. which all seem to follow logically.

Comment author: Discredited 02 August 2013 11:36:59AM *  2 points [-]

Adding to the laundry list of explanations and trivializations, gender skew!

Comment author: Discredited 30 July 2013 09:43:21AM 12 points [-]

"Taking up a serious religion changes one's very practice of rationality by making doubt a disvalue." ~ Orthonormal

Comment author: Discredited 22 July 2013 04:01:00AM *  6 points [-]

Another unsatisfying Nash equilibrium in traffic control I'd like to see analyzed from a modern decision theory perspective is Braess's Paradox.

Comment author: Discredited 15 July 2013 09:46:57PM *  4 points [-]

Previous LW discussion here.

Comment author: letter7 01 July 2013 08:54:06PM 14 points [-]

There's something that happens to me with an alarming frequency, something that I almost never (or don't remember) see being referenced (and thus I don't know the proper name). I'm talking about that effect when I'm reading a text (any kind of text, textbook, blog, forum text) and suddenly I discover that two minutes passed and I advanced six lines in the text, but I just have no idea of what I read. It's like a time blackhole, and now I have to re-read it.

Sometimes it also happens in a less alarming way, but still bad: for instance, when I'm reading something that is deliberately teaching me an important piece of knowledge (as in, I already know whathever is in this text IS important) I happen to go through it without questioning anything, just "accepting" it and a few moments later it suddenly comes down on me when I'm ahead: "Wait... what, did he just say 2 pages ago that thermal radiation does NOT need matter to propagate?" and I have again to go back and check that I was not crazy.

While I don't know the name of this effect, I have asked some acquantainces of mine about that, while some agreed that they have it others didn't. I would like very much to eliminate this flaw, anybody knows what I could do to train myself not to do it or at least the correct name so I can research more about it?

Comment author: Discredited 11 July 2013 04:53:34PM 0 points [-]

I'm sorry to drop references without a summary, but this will have to do at the moment: "Lost thoughts: Implicit semantic interference impairs reflective access to currently active information"

Comment author: bramflakes 06 July 2013 08:15:01PM 12 points [-]

But that requires more than 3 things to happen.

Comment author: Discredited 07 July 2013 04:20:40PM *  4 points [-]

Then he would have prepared for those >3 things failing to happen.

The path leading to disaster must be averted along every possible point of intervention.

~ Quirinus Xanatos Quirrell

In response to RIP Doug Engelbart
Comment author: Discredited 04 July 2013 03:16:06AM *  8 points [-]

Every time I hear "Rest in Peace" my mind corrects with "...except not resting or at peace". Does anyone have a secular, naturalistic world view analogue? Like "whom we should remember with honor", but catchy.

Comment author: shminux 02 July 2013 08:09:26AM 6 points [-]

Who are the (remaining) PCs in the story? Harry, Dumbledore, Quirrell, Moody... Anyone else?

Comment author: Discredited 02 July 2013 12:22:51PM *  14 points [-]

Draco and Lucius, Snape, Bellatrix, Amelia Bones. Maybe the Weasley parents or Nicholas Flamel. I haven't given up on Minerva. Grindelwald is still alive and undemented.

View more: Prev | Next