Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 26 July 2016 03:55:14AM 2 points [-]

A videotaped virtual meeting on effective ways of marketing EA to a broad audience.

Comment author: James_Miller 26 July 2016 12:40:36AM *  4 points [-]

Good article overall but if the people at the Center for Policing Equity found no racial bias in police shootings do you think they would have published the results? And if they did publish such a study would Salon have let you publish an article uncritically citing its conclusions? In short: shouldn't file drawer effects cause us to be wary of this part of your article?

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 26 July 2016 03:37:51AM 4 points [-]

Yeah, totally hear you about the file drawer effect, which is why I found two separate citations besides the Center for Policing Equity, which I cited in the piece - this one, and this one. One is a poll, and the other is a government statistical analysis on traffic stops that includes race information. Neither of these is something to which the file drawer effect (publication bias) would apply.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 25 July 2016 01:28:12PM 1 point [-]

An article based on rationality-informed strategies of probabilistic thinking and de-anchoring to deal with police racial profiling. Note that the data on racial profiling is corrected for the higher rate of crimes committed by black people. This is a very by-the-numbers piece.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 24 July 2016 11:17:06PM 4 points [-]

Eugine strikes again - this is really creating a great deal of noise and reversing any indications of salience for posts. Previously, he mainly did only one downvote, now he's doing ten at a time, if my -20 karma that appeared in the last hour for the two comments I made is anything to judge by. He seems to also not only be targeting posts he dislikes, but also specific people he dislikes, such as Elo and me. Makes it really hard to judge the quality of my posts, as who knows who actually downvotes them. Frustrating.

Comment author: Elo 24 July 2016 03:56:14AM -10 points [-]

its eugine.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 24 July 2016 05:35:49AM -10 points [-]

I figured :-(

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 24 July 2016 02:57:33AM -10 points [-]

Also good to keep in mind this article by Danny Kahneman: "Why Moving to California Won’t Make You Happy".

BTW, sad to see this post downvoted, pretty good post.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 24 July 2016 02:50:38AM *  1 point [-]

This video discusses the most effective science-based strategies for communicating AI Risk to a broad audience. It focuses on issues such as minimizing the inference gap, using emotional engagement, avoiding pattern-matching to sci-fi narratives and instead pattern-matching to unemployment narratives and other topics that the audience would find realistic. It's unlisted, so you can watch and share it with others only if you have a link. Feel free to pass it on to those who you think might benefit from it.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 12 July 2016 06:06:28PM 0 points [-]

Did some rationality-informed commenting for my university television about guns and racism.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 25 June 2016 10:17:08PM 0 points [-]

An article on Psychology Today on map and terriotry and fundamental attribution error, and another one on false consensus effect.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 15 June 2016 11:48:52PM 1 point [-]

Agreed on the benefits of trying things, such as links and an additional Open section. That will give us additional data to go on.

View more: Prev | Next