g, I am merely suggesting that we take everything with a grain of salt. I'm sorry if you have a problem with that. Perhaps you are accepting atheism as uncritically as you previously accepted Christianity.

Doug, I hope I'm not exceeding too much my comment quota. But why be so pessimistic? The Talmud states "A wise person is someone who learns from everyone." Even if we do not reach complete agreement, we make pick up a few good ideas from each other.

I am looking forward to reading any comments, however many, which anyone may wish to leave on my blog. I am sure I will find them interesting.

Ah, very Latin of you. Is argumentum ad logicam something like argumentum ad webicam?

I guess we should just accept Darwinism and abandon monotheism because scientists say so. That appeal to authority is SO convincing. I can't imagine why it hasn't occurred to me?

I suppose 300 years ago, when every professor at Oxford would have told me that Jesus Christ was my Lord and Savior, I would have been a fool for denying that as well.

Quantum mechanics has posed a very serious challenge to determinism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism#Determinism.2C_quantum_mechanics_and_classical_physics

However, I would not expect someone as deeply in denial of reality as an atheist to be able to admit that.

Savagehenry, I would happy to hear you enlighten with your thoughts. If you indeed have any.

I wonder if atheists ever get a chance to think about the weakest points of their beliefs? http://jewishphilosopher.blogspot.com/2007/08/why-atheism-is-not-religion.html

Let anyone who thinks I am mistaken take the trouble to explain why. Unless they cannot.

My blog happens to be absolutely packed with rational proof of Orthodox Judaism and proof against atheism.