In response to Lonely Dissent
Comment author: James_D._Miller 28 December 2007 05:47:25AM 17 points [-]

"What takes real courage is braving the outright incomprehension of the people around you,"

I suspect that autistics are far more willing than neurotypicals to be true iconoclast because many neurotypicals find autistics incomprehensible regardless of what the autistics believe. So the price of being an intellectual iconoclast is lower for autistics than for most other people.

Comment author: James_D._Miller 25 December 2007 04:10:32AM 0 points [-]

Carl,

Are you sure the dilution of Hellworlds would work if, given that you do something today that causes you to be damned, all future copies you make of yourself will spend eternity in Hell?

Comment author: James_D._Miller 16 December 2007 09:53:36PM 0 points [-]

The Soviet new "man" that Stalin wanted to create was a half-ape, half-man super-warrior.

See http://news.scotsman.com/ViewArticle.aspx?articleid=2688011

Comment author: James_D._Miller 09 December 2007 02:13:10AM 0 points [-]

I think that militarily President Bush under-reacted to 9/11. The U.S. faces a tremendous future threat of being attacked by weapons of mass destruction. Unfortunately, before 9/11 it was politically difficult for the President to preemptively use the military to reduce such threats. 9/11 gave President Bush more political freedom and he did use it to some extent. But I fear he has not done enough. I would have preferred, for example, that the U.S., Russia, China, UK, Israel and perhaps France announced that in one year they will declare war an any other nation that either has weapons of mass destruction or doesn't allow highly intrusive inspections to make sure they don't have weapons of mass destruction. After 9/11 Bush might have been able to negotiate this. Now it is probably too late.

In response to The Halo Effect
Comment author: James_D._Miller 30 November 2007 01:21:57AM 4 points [-]

Perhaps firms should conduct "blind" interviews of potential employees in which the potential employee is interviewed while behind a screen.

Comment author: James_D._Miller 25 November 2007 03:27:32PM 0 points [-]

TGGP,

I have not read the Myth of the Rule of Law.

Comment author: James_D._Miller 25 November 2007 05:31:16AM 0 points [-]

In the first year of law school students learn that for every clear legal rule there always exists situations for which either the rule doesn't apply or for which the rule gives a bad outcome. This is why we always need to give judges some discretion when administering the law.

In response to Thou Art Godshatter
Comment author: James_D._Miller 13 November 2007 08:21:27PM 5 points [-]

Eliezer, you wrote:

"Or else what would we do with the future? What would we do with the billion galaxies in the night sky? Fill them with maximally efficient replicators? Should our descendants deliberately obsess about maximizing their inclusive genetic fitness, regarding all else only as a means to that end?"

Won't our descendants who do have genes or code that causes them to maximize their genetic fitness come to dominate the billions of galaxies. How can there be any other stable long term equilibrium in a universe in which many lifeforms have the ability to choose their own utility functions?

Comment author: James_D._Miller 03 November 2007 04:49:39PM 2 points [-]

Eliezer,

Your posts on evolution are fantastic. I hope there will be many more of them.

Comment author: James_D._Miller 30 October 2007 03:39:26PM 14 points [-]

Torture,

Consider three possibilities:

(a) A dusk speck hits you with probability one, (b) You face an additional probability 1/( 3^^^3) of being tortured for 50 years, (c) You must blink your eyes for a fraction of a second, just long enough to prevent a dusk speck from hitting you in the eye.

Most people would pick (c) over (a). Yet, 1/( 3^^^3) is such a small number that by blinking your eyes one more time than you normally would you increase your chances of being captured by a sadist and tortured for 50 years by more than 1/( 3^^^3). Thus, (b) must be better than (c). Consequently, most people should prefer (b) to (a).

View more: Prev | Next