In response to Blogs by LWers
Comment author: TimS 22 June 2012 01:02:09PM 5 points [-]
In response to comment by TimS on Blogs by LWers
Comment author: Karmakaiser 22 June 2012 02:27:07PM 0 points [-]

My naive introspection says yes. I seem to remember someone being excited he was a LWer.

In response to comment by [deleted] on The Power of Reinforcement
Comment author: wedrifid 21 June 2012 04:17:41PM *  5 points [-]

Don't worry they have a back up plan. Someone just has to bring up the "negging" straw man. It dosen't matter in their minds that most PUAs don't teach that any more because newbies tend to mess it up.

"Deliberately behaving attractively is Rape!"

It's comparatively easy to start a flame war on that subject. I've argued against both sides at times, when their respective extremists started saying ridiculous things.

Comment author: Karmakaiser 21 June 2012 05:40:59PM 2 points [-]

I think I remember that. Weren't you replying to yourself over and over again taking different sides?

Comment author: palladias 19 June 2012 05:04:19AM 8 points [-]

I read the curated blog, not the discussion forum so much. You got rumbled by google analytics, which showed me a lot of traffic coming from here. I'm actually going to the July rationality minicamp, so if any people in this thread are going to, they can distill the best of this thread for what I assume are forthcoming fights.

Comment author: Karmakaiser 19 June 2012 03:09:47PM 6 points [-]

I'm actually going to the July rationality minicamp,

Please, please, please blog this. I would love reading it.

Comment author: jacob_cannell 12 June 2012 11:18:05PM 4 points [-]

This is interesting in what it suggests for the future.

Romney is a conservative mormon, for example.

Beck's rant proposing that the political left is aligned with a nebulous big-government/big-business anti-technological movement may be mostly rhetorical hot air, but it did make me wonder . ..

Well before AGI is super-intelligent, weaker AGI and stronger narrow AI will likely lead to a hugely disruptive socio-economic disruption. This isn't being discussed much (outside of perhaps a lone blog and book or two).

Actually, this transition is already under way. The current slow-burn economic crisis is likely just the beginning. Crisis has a way of sparking political change. What will the masses do when most people have real economic value that is well below subsistence?

Comment author: Karmakaiser 13 June 2012 12:59:47PM 3 points [-]

Beck's rant proposing that the political left is aligned with a nebulous big-government/big-business anti-technological movement may be mostly rhetorical hot air, but it did make me wonder . ..

I get the same feeling with Thiel noticing our lack of techno-optimism in our culture compared with our optimism at 1950. Doesn't he largely blame entrenched interests putting up regulation to stop new start ups?

Comment author: Nornagest 13 June 2012 08:36:37AM *  2 points [-]

Yes, but fanfic of what? I'd hate to learn I was living in a Lovecraft pastiche... or worse, a Lifetime Original Movie.

Comment author: Karmakaiser 13 June 2012 12:57:22PM 1 point [-]

Lovecraft pastiche

Explains the preoccupation with the basilisk.

Comment author: Multiheaded 13 June 2012 10:38:13AM *  0 points [-]

The first glance, as usual, reveals interesting things about one's perception:

Moldbuggery: Bias is bad, real fucking bad. The current systems don't encourage rationality all that much either. Only a cognitive elite can ever become debased enough to run things

That's honestly how I read it at first. Ha.

BTW Konkvistador belongs in better company (nothing against the others); I've come to admire him a little bit and think he's much wiser than other fans of Moldbug.

Oh, and speaking of good company... "pure cynicism about how things are combined with an idealism of how to act" - that sounds like the ethics that Philip K. Dick tenatively proposes in his Exegesis; shit's fucked, blind semi-conscious evil rules the world, but there's a Super-Value to being kind and human even in the face of Armageddon.

Comment author: Karmakaiser 13 June 2012 12:55:35PM 2 points [-]

I asked Konkvistador if he endorsed the Moldbuggery statement in IRC and he liked it. But I think I want to decontextualize the attitudes toward bias and debiasing So I can better fit different authors/posters together. :/

I've come up with /fatalism/pessimism/elitism/rational schizophrenia/optimism . With that breakdown I can put Konvistador in the same category with Plato. I love the name rational schizophrenia too much to give it up.

Comment author: ciphergoth 13 June 2012 06:49:05AM 3 points [-]

No, I'm referring to the fact that before the Trinity test lots of people greatly underestimated what the yield would be. Someone must surely have said "it will be a little bigger than our conventional bombs".

Comment author: Karmakaiser 13 June 2012 06:59:28AM 0 points [-]

It will go boom and look bright. I dunno what else, I just clear the floors.

Comment author: wedrifid 13 June 2012 06:50:35AM 1 point [-]

Am I severely mistaken or is this a heuristically good way to think about Will in your own opinion?

I like the way you put it. :)

Comment author: Karmakaiser 13 June 2012 06:58:30AM 0 points [-]

I give caveats and hedge my statements to be narrow at funerals. Literally. It's what I do. I did so two weeks ago.

Would you endorse the heavily caveat filled hedged statement?

Comment author: ciphergoth 13 June 2012 06:43:20AM 1 point [-]

Your overall point is well taken, but you're interpreting "century" to mean "last hundred years". The way I'd interpret the word, this is a candidate for understatement of the last century. And the winner was probably somewhere near the Trinity test...

Comment author: Karmakaiser 13 June 2012 06:45:49AM 0 points [-]

"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." Strikes me as just statement statement not over or under (I'm assuming this is your reference?)

Comment author: Will_Newsome 02 June 2012 04:26:30PM *  3 points [-]

If I were to join any phyg, it'd be the Dominicans. SingInst might be my second choice, but you can't join them, you can only join the Rationalist Conspiracy these days. And I've already left SingInst's Journeyman circle or whatever, there's no going back after that. But I'm damn glad I was a Visiting Fellow for two years.

Comment author: Karmakaiser 13 June 2012 06:28:42AM 1 point [-]

What do you think of the Greek Othordox? Nassim Taleb endorses them for aesthetic reasons and for the fact that their understanding of God is Apophatic primarily and thus doesn't intrude on real world near beliefs.

View more: Prev | Next