Comment author: Lumifer 16 December 2013 05:06:48PM 1 point [-]

We know that low-carb is effective at losing weight. The jury is still out on whether low-carb is healthy in the long term.

Similarly, while it is clear that being obese is unhealthy, I don't think that there is any evidence to show that being very thin (having low body fat %) is healthier than being normal.

Comment author: Laoch 17 December 2013 08:32:50AM 0 points [-]

Depends on what you mean by normal?

Comment author: Lumifer 16 December 2013 04:29:30PM 2 points [-]

It's high carb?

And why is that a problem? You seem to be implying that a low-carb diet is The Only True Way which looks doubtful.

If you are trying to go on a cut i.e. want a six pack

The claim was about "health-conscious" people, not body-image-conscious.

Comment author: Laoch 16 December 2013 04:38:02PM *  2 points [-]

And why is that a problem? You seem to be implying that a low-carb diet is The Only True Way which looks doubtful.

Because of the negative effects it has on your insulin response, leading to pancreas fatigue and type 2 diabetes.

The claim was about "health-conscious" people, not body-image-conscious.

I was under the impression that a low body fat percentage was healthier. Perhaps I'm wrong. I must admit my beliefs are influenced by aesthetics. I'd bet on low abdominal fat been the optimal via a low-ish carb diet.

Comment author: Lumifer 16 December 2013 03:30:56PM 3 points [-]

Occasionally even health-conscious people eat stuff like pizza

What's wrong with healthy people (in particular, gluten-tolerant) eating pizza?

Comment author: Laoch 16 December 2013 04:24:50PM 1 point [-]

It's high carb? It gives me heartburn (probably gluten intolerance?). If you are trying to go on a cut i.e. want a six pack it's a bad idea.

Comment author: Laoch 16 December 2013 11:32:45AM 0 points [-]

Is it meaningful to say something is only deterministic from the point of view of an observer?

In response to comment by [deleted] on Academic Cliques
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 08 November 2013 08:15:44PM 3 points [-]

I've wondered about that. Someone should try writing an iPad app that a toddler can play with to have their brain bombarded by math, and see if that leads to math coming as naturally to them as language. I doubt it would work but it might be worth trying.

Comment author: Laoch 13 December 2013 09:14:25AM 0 points [-]

I think this book maybe of some interest to you Chris. It was the text book recommend for a CogSci class I did, dealing with how cognitive systems develop in response to their environment.

Comment author: VAuroch 12 December 2013 01:15:06PM 1 point [-]

Politics? I don't understand how.

Also, above comment should in no way be taken as criticism of GEB. It's great. It's just that that's pretty much all he has to his credit.

Comment author: Laoch 12 December 2013 01:33:53PM 0 points [-]

I mean people want to tear chunks out of it for status reasons... ...I think.

Comment author: VAuroch 12 December 2013 10:39:51AM -1 points [-]

To be fair, Hoftstadter is basically a one-trick pony, in that he published one academically-relevant book and then more or less jumped straight to Professor Emeritus in all but name, publishing very little and interacting with academia even less.

Comment author: Laoch 12 December 2013 10:54:48AM 0 points [-]

Just wishing I had read GEB sooner. Reading it now and it seems to be getting ruined by politics.

Comment author: ESRogs 11 December 2013 05:11:45PM 2 points [-]

Oh, did I? I'm sorry to hear that it hasn't turned out to be helpful. It sounds like you are serious about getting the help you need though. Identifying the problem is obviously one of the most important steps to the solution. :) Good luck, friend!

Comment author: Laoch 12 December 2013 08:37:29AM 2 points [-]

I should really ring the GP today.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 December 2013 08:02:58PM 4 points [-]

But I'm also assuming you know very little about debate tactics, is that correct? If so, the sentence I quoted seems to imply you seem to think you should be able to handle quite a wide range of things on the fly.

Nnnoo, it implies I thought I should be able to handle a wide range of events inside a public conversation (about religion) on the fly. This is a tiny slice of human endeavor.

I probably wouldn't say something similar nowadays, and I worry whether that might be due to decrease of energy rather than calibration of confidence.

Comment author: Laoch 11 December 2013 12:26:45PM 0 points [-]

Thinking is metabolically expensive I guess(?)

Comment author: Ishaan 11 December 2013 08:45:10AM *  0 points [-]

er...what? I do not understand.

Comment author: Laoch 11 December 2013 08:49:34AM 0 points [-]

Aw shit seg fault :D

View more: Prev | Next