Comment author: XFrequentist 09 July 2009 10:57:05PM 0 points [-]

One of my favorite books, but do you think it's appropriate for this list?

Comment author: Lawliet 10 July 2009 01:21:19AM 1 point [-]

Not sure what exactly should count as appropriate, I had assumed that the votes would sort the good from the bad, but maybe people would be less inclined to downvote a book they liked, which could be a problem with a well-liked book.

Is it enough that these comments could serve as a warning, or do you suggest I delete/edit the post?

Comment author: Lawliet 09 July 2009 10:45:03PM 15 points [-]

The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins

Comment author: Lawliet 09 July 2009 10:42:33PM 6 points [-]

Godel, Escher, Bach, Douglas Hofstadter

Comment author: Lawliet 09 July 2009 10:40:19PM 1 point [-]

Heuristics and Biases, collection edited by Daniel Kahneman, Thomas Gilovich and Dale Griffin

Comment author: Lawliet 09 July 2009 10:38:05PM 3 points [-]
Comment author: Lawliet 09 July 2009 10:36:17PM 8 points [-]

Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, collection edited by Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky and Paul Slovic

Comment author: Lawliet 22 May 2009 05:24:12AM 1 point [-]

Dont understand the "activity" part, the post implied sleeping was fine, so does breathing count?

Comment author: CannibalSmith 15 May 2009 06:01:29AM *  0 points [-]
  1. ~0.01
  2. No, because it's nonsense.
  3. Hiding below 1 karma.
  4. Whether the post or the comment in question seems important.
  5. Don't know.
  6. What?
  7. No, because I have nothing to say.
  8. Sorting posts and comments according to importance. Mostly.
  9. None.
  10. No.
  11. I smile.
  12. Stop fussing over voting! Now!
Comment author: Lawliet 15 May 2009 06:21:28AM 1 point [-]

Stop fussing over voting! Now!

It's an important part of the site, and it'll pay off if it's done well.

Comment author: Lawliet 15 May 2009 05:21:05AM 1 point [-]

Requesting a short summary of the current plans for future changes the voting system, preferably from someone in a position to know.

In response to Survey Results
Comment author: timtyler 12 May 2009 10:41:07PM 3 points [-]

Re: Probability of an average person cryonically frozen today being successfully revived: 22.3, 10, 26.2.

An enormous estimate, IMO - close to that given by the salesmen(!):

http://www.alcor.org/Library/html/WillCryonicsWork.html

In response to comment by timtyler on Survey Results
Comment author: Lawliet 13 May 2009 12:21:04AM 2 points [-]

It's probably not mentioned enough that cryonics can be justified even if it looks like it probably wont work, as long as it's past some threshold.

View more: Next