The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins
Godel, Escher, Bach, Douglas Hofstadter
Heuristics and Biases, collection edited by Daniel Kahneman, Thomas Gilovich and Dale Griffin
Predictably Irrational, Dan Ariely
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, collection edited by Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky and Paul Slovic
Dont understand the "activity" part, the post implied sleeping was fine, so does breathing count?
- ~0.01
- No, because it's nonsense.
- Hiding below 1 karma.
- Whether the post or the comment in question seems important.
- Don't know.
- What?
- No, because I have nothing to say.
- Sorting posts and comments according to importance. Mostly.
- None.
- No.
- I smile.
- Stop fussing over voting! Now!
Stop fussing over voting! Now!
It's an important part of the site, and it'll pay off if it's done well.
Requesting a short summary of the current plans for future changes the voting system, preferably from someone in a position to know.
Re: Probability of an average person cryonically frozen today being successfully revived: 22.3, 10, 26.2.
An enormous estimate, IMO - close to that given by the salesmen(!):
It's probably not mentioned enough that cryonics can be justified even if it looks like it probably wont work, as long as it's past some threshold.
View more: Next
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
One of my favorite books, but do you think it's appropriate for this list?
Not sure what exactly should count as appropriate, I had assumed that the votes would sort the good from the bad, but maybe people would be less inclined to downvote a book they liked, which could be a problem with a well-liked book.
Is it enough that these comments could serve as a warning, or do you suggest I delete/edit the post?